[Bug 283425] [nullfs] nosuid bypass

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283425 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|In Progress |Closed Assignee|b...@free

[Bug 283425] [nullfs] nosuid bypass

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283425 --- Comment #8 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit in branch stable/14 references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=57d12ea5c9b07a6407e3518aeb2383f29be727d2 commit 57d12ea5c9b07a6407e3518aeb2383f29be727d2 Author:

[Bug 283425] [nullfs] nosuid bypass

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283425 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ema...@freebsd.org Status|N

[Bug 283425] [nullfs] nosuid bypass

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283425 --- Comment #7 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=709989bab5d060763bb8fd8e75d33f8bd1d454ad commit 709989bab5d060763bb8fd8e75d33f8bd1d454ad Author:

[Bug 283425] [nullfs] nosuid bypass

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283425 --- Comment #6 from Sulev-Madis Silber --- (In reply to Konstantin Belousov from comment #5) yes. it would confuse hell out of tools and users if some options appear to be configured and they are not. esp one that actually (try) to impose r

[Bug 283425] [nullfs] nosuid bypass

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283425 --- Comment #5 from Konstantin Belousov --- (In reply to Sulev-Madis Silber from comment #3) Do you mean that the whole idea of copying the lower fs mnt_flags is not useful? I think that I would agree with such statement. -- You are recei

[Bug 283425] [nullfs] nosuid bypass

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283425 --- Comment #4 from Sulev-Madis Silber --- this also confuses 100.chksetuid and 110.neggrpperm which now wrongly exclude fses from check list -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 283425] [nullfs] nosuid bypass

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283425 --- Comment #3 from Sulev-Madis Silber --- what about others, noexec and nosymfollow do it too? additionally, if src is updated, no options change in null. maybe it can't be done but it's confusing. eg fs becomes ro, is ro but doesn't show

[Bug 283425] [nullfs] nosuid bypass

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283425 Konstantin Belousov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@freebsd.org --- Comment

[Bug 283425] [nullfs] nosuid bypass

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283425 --- Comment #1 from Sulev-Madis Silber --- 23:35,root@green:~# lh ping -r-sr-xr-x 1 root wheel61K Oct 30 14:35 ping 23:35,root@green:~# mount_nullfs /root/ /mnt/ 23:35,root@green:~# mount | fgrep ' /mnt ' /root on /mnt (nullfs, local,

[Bug 283425] [nullfs] nosuid bypass

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283425 Bug ID: 283425 Summary: [nullfs] nosuid bypass Product: Base System Version: Unspecified Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Many Pe