https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279546
Alan Somers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279546
--- Comment #5 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch stable/14 references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=95fbdf9df5b0918668517298d3ca77b65361b756
commit 95fbdf9df5b0918668517298d3ca77b65361b756
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279546
--- Comment #4 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=bb95fbf634b3459363a136899e9b241a2f6c49cd
commit bb95fbf634b3459363a136899e9b241a2f6c49cd
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279546
Alan Somers changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://reviews.freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279546
--- Comment #3 from Alan Somers ---
That sounds good. Let's remove it completely from the man page. From the
binary, let's recognize it but print a warning and remove in FreeBSD 16. I can
submit a phabricator patch for this.
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279546
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Motin ---
It is hard to recall why have I done that 9 years ago, but it seems `ctladm
port -l` is equivalent to `ctladm portlist`. And `-x` and `-q` arguments are
useless without `-l`. I guess I could keep i
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279546
--- Comment #1 from Alan Somers ---
Similarly, the "-x" and "-q" options got removed from the man page in the same
commit, but are still present in the command.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279546
Bug ID: 279546
Summary: ctladm.8 is inconsistent about "ctladm port"'s "-l"
option
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
