[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|f...@freebsd.org -- You are receiv

[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 Wayne Willcox changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wwillc...@gmail.com --- Comment #1

[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 --- Comment #16 from Gunther Schadow --- Bump. Ping! Any comments? Can this go into the next release? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@f

[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 --- Comment #15 from Gunther Schadow --- See the related bug 251433 for the completion of this work as the unionfs_copyfile now works with root cred and the copymode=transparent will properly reflect the owner uid and gid. There is one pro

[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 Gunther Schadow changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu

[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 --- Comment #13 from Gunther Schadow --- Further confirmation of the problem, which is now a bug of unionfs not following its own specification for copymode = transparent. The files do not get copied with the original owner credentials. Pr

[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 --- Comment #12 from Gunther Schadow --- While it works in principle, there is a little problem. Here is on a system which actually has /usr mounted via NFS. Root sets up the unionfs cache: # mkdir /var/cache/ # mount -t unionfs -o copypo

[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 --- Comment #11 from Gunther Schadow --- Created attachment 219985 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=219985&action=edit the patch as a separate file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 Gunther Schadow changed: What|Removed |Added Version|Unspecified |12.2-RELEASE Severity|

[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 --- Comment #9 from Gunther Schadow --- For completeness sake, I updated the mount_unionfs.8 man file also. Full diff out of /usr/src with svnlite diff -x-w: Index: sbin/mount_unionfs/mount_unionfs.8 ==

[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 --- Comment #8 from Gunther Schadow --- Another erratum, I didn't realize at first the unionfs doesn't even require a block device nor a mount-point directory, but rather, it can use any directory. This is awesome, so none of this mdconfig

[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 --- Comment #7 from Gunther Schadow --- Erratum: I said "I can evict from the cache by writing to the unionfs" -- I meant by removing files from that /cache file system. I wasn't clear that in order to mount a unionfs, you must already have

[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 --- Comment #6 from Gunther Schadow --- Success! Here is my full diff in /usr/src/sys/fs/unionfs # svnlite diff -x-w Index: union.h === --- union.h (revision 368012) +++ un

[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 --- Comment #5 from Gunther Schadow --- Updated the stackexchange link with a draft design to allow to use rm and rmdir to evict entries from the cache, new whitemode UNIONFS_WHITE_NEVER would do that. I love how the kernel sources seem to

[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 --- Comment #4 from Gunther Schadow --- Packrat patches for NFSv4, experimental: https://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _

[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 --- Comment #3 from Gunther Schadow --- ... the above request answered here: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2008-September/005140.html, it was acknowledged but said that nothing exists. -- You are receiving this mail becau

[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 --- Comment #2 from Gunther Schadow --- Cross references on the subject: Feature request and mentioning Solaris cachefs and Linux FS-cache: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2008-August/181446.html -- You are receivi

[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 --- Comment #1 from Gunther Schadow --- Update, I have applied the patch of the 12.2-RELEASE kernel source and building it now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251363 Bug ID: 251363 Summary: use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature] Product: Base System Version: Unspecified Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Se