[Bug 236559] Error in the pwd man page

2019-10-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236559 verma...@interia.pl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Closed Resolution|---

[Bug 236559] Error in the pwd man page

2019-05-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236559 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Base System |Documentation Component|mi

[Bug 236559] Error in the pwd man page

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236559 --- Comment #3 from Mark Johnston --- (In reply to vermaden from comment #2) It's mostly a question of whether changing the default will break existing scripts. sh, bash and zsh use a builtin implementation for pwd, but tcsh in the base s

[Bug 236559] Error in the pwd man page

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236559 --- Comment #2 from verma...@interia.pl --- (In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #1) So shell builtin (ZSH) behaves correctly with POSIX standards. IMHO FreeBSD should also be correct with POSIX standards so option -L should be assumed i

[Bug 236559] Error in the pwd man page

2019-03-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236559 Mark Johnston changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ma...@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug 236559] Error in the pwd man page

2019-03-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236559 Bug ID: 236559 Summary: Error in the pwd man page Product: Base System Version: 12.0-RELEASE Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Man