[Bug 229571] lam(1) man-page doesn't document -S

2019-03-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229571 --- Comment #8 from Tim Chase --- (In reply to Rodrigo Osorio from comment #7) It looks like the patch is was accepted, so I have no objections to closing. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 229571] lam(1) man-page doesn't document -S

2019-03-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229571 Tim Chase changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|New

[Bug 229571] lam(1) man-page doesn't document -S

2019-03-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229571 --- Comment #7 from Rodrigo Osorio --- Can we mark this issue resolved ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https

[Bug 229571] lam(1) man-page doesn't document -S

2019-01-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229571 --- Comment #6 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: allanjude Date: Fri Jan 4 02:48:43 UTC 2019 New revision: 342754 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/342754 Log: The lam(1) man page is unc

[Bug 229571] lam(1) man-page doesn't document -S

2018-07-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229571 Tim Chase changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #194921|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 229571] lam(1) man-page doesn't document -S

2018-07-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229571 --- Comment #4 from Allan Jude --- (In reply to Tim Chase from comment #3) I think it makes the most sense to expand them fully, as if we were writing the man page for the first time. Have each of the uppercase options spelled out explicitl

[Bug 229571] lam(1) man-page doesn't document -S

2018-07-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229571 --- Comment #3 from Tim Chase --- The main issue that triggered this is the common pattern of encountering an unknown option, issuing man lam and then doing a /-S to learn more about the unknown option. In the case of "-S", it pops

[Bug 229571] lam(1) man-page doesn't document -S

2018-07-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229571 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug 229571] lam(1) man-page doesn't document -S

2018-07-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229571 Allan Jude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||allanj...@freebsd.org --- Comment #2

[Bug 229571] lam(1) man-page doesn't document -S

2018-07-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229571 Rodrigo Osorio changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rodr...@freebsd.org --- Comment #

[Bug 229571] lam(1) man-page doesn't document -S

2018-07-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229571 Bug ID: 229571 Summary: lam(1) man-page doesn't document -S Product: Documentation Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affec