https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224300
Brooks Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224300
Bug 224300 depends on bug 224443, which changed state.
Bug 224443 Summary: exp-run: SysV IPC API cleanup
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224443
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224300
--- Comment #4 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: brooks
Date: Fri Mar 2 22:34:56 UTC 2018
New revision: 463452
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/463452
Log:
Work around the lack of defi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224300
--- Comment #3 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: brooks
Date: Fri Mar 2 22:32:54 UTC 2018
New revision: 330299
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/330299
Log:
Don't declare union semun in
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224300
Brooks Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||224443
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224300
--- Comment #2 from Brooks Davis ---
That would be a reasonable approach. In the patch I'm working on for an
exp-run I've simply redeclared it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224300
--- Comment #1 from Ed Maste ---
It's also used in libc; would you propose something like
#if defined(_KERNEL) || defined(_WANT_SEMUN)
and use that to make the definition available to lib/libc/gen/semctl.c?
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224300
Bug ID: 224300
Summary: sys/sem.h improperly declares union semun
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: