https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223532
Stefan Eßer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223532
--- Comment #8 from Stefan Eßer ---
(In reply to Helge Oldach from comment #5)
My comment #4 referred to the commengt #3, which used BSD fgrep (despite the
title of the PR referring to GNU egrep).
I have first compared fgrep with C or UTF
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223532
--- Comment #7 from Helge Oldach ---
(In reply to dsdqmhsx from comment #6)
Thanks. Anyhow WITH_INTERNAL_NOSPEC fixed it for me; now "-i" vs. non "-i"
means a factor of 2 or 3 or so which is expected.
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223532
--- Comment #6 from dsdqm...@mm.st ---
You seem to be updating wrong issue, this one talks about now-nonexistent GNU
grep/libgnuregex in base, and should be just closed. For bsdgrep (or simply
grep now) bug 223553 looks like a better place.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223532
--- Comment #5 from Helge Oldach ---
(In reply to Stefan Eßer from comment #4)
> The performance impact of using -i with or without UTF-8 is only a factor of
> about 3 instead of 100:
I said with "-i" vs. without "-i" would make two 2 ord
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223532
Stefan Eßer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223532
Helge Oldach changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||free...@oldach.net
--- Comment #3 f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223532
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ema...@freebsd.org
Summary|e
