https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219213
Jung-uk Kim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org|j...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #12 fro
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219213
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ko...@freebsd.org |freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
--- Comme
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219213
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Closed |In Progress
Resolution|FIX
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219213
Conrad Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219213
Bug 219213 depends on bug 221621, which changed state.
Bug 221621 Summary: Ryzen Threadripper - hwpstate0 - repeated set frequency
failed err 6
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221621
What|Removed
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219213
Conrad Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||221621
--- Comment #7 from Conrad M
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219213
mail...@yahoo.co.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mail...@yahoo.co.jp
--- Comme
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219213
--- Comment #5 from SF ---
After sleeping and reading the stuff from powerd++ over and over again to
understand it there is just one problem to my idea and this is responsiveness.
I dont know how the load is calculated while the cpu is thr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219213
--- Comment #4 from SF ---
This made me think about it, my first example was good but still inherits
problems. This one is closer to final.
e.x.:
1 primary interval(long time period) to reset counters
1 secondary interval(short time period
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219213
--- Comment #3 from SF ---
Compared to powerd? Much better.
Compared to my solution? Its something different and powerd++ adresses it
another way and also has temperatur-management. It's primitive in the part of
calculating the needed p-st
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219213
--- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer ---
Does powerd++ (available as a port "powerdxx") work any better?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@fr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219213
--- Comment #1 from SF ---
To be more specific about power-saving features:
CPU's have different p-states since a long time now but powerd only knows 3
options to set:
adaptive, maximum, minimum
I have only 2 options for the adaptive-mod
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219213
Bug ID: 219213
Summary: powerd causing problems with ryzen
Product: Base System
Version: 11.0-STABLE
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: A
13 matches
Mail list logo