https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207898
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|k...@freebsd.org
Resolution
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207898
--- Comment #12 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch stable/13 references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=4305fd126c77143f3f3205e201ec413ae2012a0f
commit 4305fd126c77143f3f3205e201ec413ae2012a0f
Author
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207898
--- Comment #13 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch stable/13 references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=da536d64b7ee713d0299d817db172ab0352d26a2
commit da536d64b7ee713d0299d817db172ab0352d26a2
Author
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207898
--- Comment #11 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=ecd8245e0d7784bcd78dafce233f303eee765068
commit ecd8245e0d7784bcd78dafce233f303eee765068
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207898
--- Comment #10 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=95c20faf11a1af6924f97ec4aafc32d899fea8b0
commit 95c20faf11a1af6924f97ec4aafc32d899fea8b0
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207898
--- Comment #9 from Ed Maste ---
(In reply to Konstantin Belousov from comment #8)
I agree wide-scale testing is unlikely, but I'm sure some of our downstreams
would test. In any case, having it as an emergency revert option seems useful
an
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207898
--- Comment #8 from Konstantin Belousov ---
I revived by 10+ years old patches in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D32878
WRT to sysctl, I am not sure that this is soo great idea, because nobody would
toggle it to help debug. Might be, it inde
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207898
--- Comment #7 from Justin Cady ---
(In reply to Ed Maste from comment #6)
Thank you, Ed. I appreciate the answers to those questions, and your proposal
for resolving this issue looks good to me.
I have not exhaustively searched in-tree m
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207898
--- Comment #6 from Ed Maste ---
(In reply to Don Lewis from comment #3)
> Why would the linker ignore the flag for local symbols?
I suspect there is no satisfying reason. It was probably just never
implemented, and had no (or very limited
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207898
--- Comment #5 from Justin Cady ---
If anyone knows the answer to my above questions I would still appreciate it.
But I wanted to share a bit of history I found...an old freebsd-hackers thread
titled "Kernel linker and undefined references
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207898
Justin Cady changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@justincady.com
--- Comment #4 f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207898
--- Comment #3 from Don Lewis ---
The dummynet AQM patch accidentally abused this when it added two new files
that referenced an existing static variable one of the pre-existing source
files. This was not caught because the authors only te
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207898
Jilles Tjoelker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jil...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207898
--- Comment #1 from Don Lewis ---
Most of the kernel linker code is MI, but there is some MD code in
/usr/src/sys/{amd64/amd64,i386/i386}/elf_machdep.c. I didn't see anything
suspicious there.
The MI code is difficult to figure out, but t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207898
Bug ID: 207898
Summary: kernel linker behaves differently on amd64 vs. i386
Product: Base System
Version: 11.0-CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
15 matches
Mail list logo
