[Bug 207223] acpica/acpi_battery.c: introduce hw.acpi.battery.rate sysctl

2016-05-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207223 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org|freebsd-a...@freebsd.org -- You ar

[Bug 207223] acpica/acpi_battery.c: introduce hw.acpi.battery.rate sysctl

2016-03-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207223 --- Comment #8 from Johannes Jost Meixner --- Hence: Yes, you're right - in the case that battery voltage can't be obtained the item stays in mA. What's the best way to solve this in the description? -- You are receiving this mail becaus

[Bug 207223] acpica/acpi_battery.c: introduce hw.acpi.battery.rate sysctl

2016-03-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207223 --- Comment #7 from Johannes Jost Meixner --- (In reply to Ed Maste from comment #6) This should be dealt with by the following code in the same file, if I'm not mistaken: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_battery.

[Bug 207223] acpica/acpi_battery.c: introduce hw.acpi.battery.rate sysctl

2016-03-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207223 --- Comment #6 from Ed Maste --- > Please add something to the description to indicate the units of the sysctl > (mW?). Note that acpiconf -i0 reports mW on some systems and mA on others, so I'm not sure that mW is always correct. -- Yo

[Bug 207223] acpica/acpi_battery.c: introduce hw.acpi.battery.rate sysctl

2016-03-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207223 --- Comment #5 from Conrad E. Meyer --- (In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #4) mW is a rate :). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@free

Re: [Bug 207223] acpica/acpi_battery.c: introduce hw.acpi.battery.rate sysctl

2016-03-10 Thread Konstantin Schukraft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/10/2016 15:35, bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org wrote: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207223 > > --- Comment #4 from Sean Bruno --- hrm. Is it > mW/second or something? A rate indicates some factor of time. > Watt already

[Bug 207223] acpica/acpi_battery.c: introduce hw.acpi.battery.rate sysctl

2016-03-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207223 --- Comment #4 from Sean Bruno --- hrm. Is it mW/second or something? A rate indicates some factor of time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebs

[Bug 207223] acpica/acpi_battery.c: introduce hw.acpi.battery.rate sysctl

2016-03-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207223 Johannes Jost Meixner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #167043|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 207223] acpica/acpi_battery.c: introduce hw.acpi.battery.rate sysctl

2016-03-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207223 Sean Bruno changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@freebsd.org, |

[Bug 207223] acpica/acpi_battery.c: introduce hw.acpi.battery.rate sysctl

2016-02-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207223 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug 207223] acpica/acpi_battery.c: introduce hw.acpi.battery.rate sysctl

2016-02-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207223 --- Comment #1 from Lars Engels --- Works for me (TP X230): # sysctl hw.acpi.battery.rate hw.acpi.battery.rate: 13834 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 207223] acpica/acpi_battery.c: introduce hw.acpi.battery.rate sysctl

2016-02-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207223 Bug ID: 207223 Summary: acpica/acpi_battery.c: introduce hw.acpi.battery.rate sysctl Product: Base System Version: 11.0-CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any