https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200863
Dimitry Andric changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Progress |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200863
--- Comment #12 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: dim
Date: Fri Jul 3 20:31:27 UTC 2015
New revision: 285110
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/285110
Log:
MFC r284732:
Add __cxa_delet
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200863
--- Comment #11 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: dim
Date: Fri Jul 3 20:29:05 UTC 2015
New revision: 285109
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/285109
Log:
MFC r284732:
Add __cxa_delet
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200863
--- Comment #10 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: dim
Date: Tue Jun 23 17:54:25 UTC 2015
New revision: 284732
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/284732
Log:
Add __cxa_deleted_virtual to li
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200863
--- Comment #9 from David Chisnall ---
(In reply to yuri from comment #7)
They are intended to be ABI compatible (or, rather, libcxxrt intends to support
a superset of the libsupc++ ABI). In the base system, we link both libstdc++
and lib
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200863
--- Comment #8 from Ed Maste ---
Here's a useful comment on ABI compat on various c++ support libs:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2015-February/082620.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200863
--- Comment #7 from y...@rawbw.com ---
libsupc++ is for gcc-compiled C++, and libcxxer is for clang-compiled C++. They
aren't compatible much anyway, can't really be mixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200863
Dimitry Andric changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |In Progress
--- Comment #6 from D
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200863
--- Comment #5 from Ed Maste ---
> Maybe it's best to also put 'our' symbol under this namespace, for the sake
> of compatibility?
Yes, probably makes sense make it easy to swap in libsupc++ for testing.
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200863
Dimitry Andric changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@freebsd.org,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200863
--- Comment #3 from y...@rawbw.com ---
I had to create the copy of this function in the port patch to solve the
problem. But if more and more port projects begin to use this feature, this
will turn into a problem that all released 10.X syste
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200863
--- Comment #2 from y...@rawbw.com ---
Virtual function deletion triggered the problem
(http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3910083/deleting-virtual-functions-in-c0x)
This is relatively new feature introduced in c++11. Maybe it isn't used mu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200863
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ema...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200863
Bug ID: 200863
Summary: Added missing '__cxa_deleted_virtual' into libcxxrt
Product: Base System
Version: 10.1-STABLE
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
14 matches
Mail list logo
