https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199587
Robert Clausecker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|b...@
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199587
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|misc|kern
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199587
--- Comment #1 from Eitan Adler ---
(adding to the bug)
>From bde:
This is basically confusing the compiler to produce not so good code
in a different way.
Your implementation is a bit cleaner since it doesn't arrange the source
code in
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org wrote:
I've been tinkering with the code, out of curiosity, and I've reimplemented
strncmp() to check the performance. Here are my results and the benchmark code:
42359800221 cycles -- FreeBSD strncmp()
42113090043 cycles -- FreeB
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199587
Bug ID: 199587
Summary: libc strncmp() performance
Product: Base System
Version: 10.1-STABLE
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Man
