[Bug 199169] [patch] zone "UMA Zones" has bigger size than need

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199169 Dmitry Chagin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |In Progress Assignee|fre

[Bug 199169] [patch] zone "UMA Zones" has bigger size than need

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199169 --- Comment #4 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: dchagin Date: Mon Apr 6 18:45:42 UTC 2015 New revision: 281162 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/281162 Log: Properly calculate "UMA Zone

[Bug 199169] [patch] zone "UMA Zones" has bigger size than need

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199169 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Chagin --- (In reply to luke.tw from comment #2) Yes, I see. It would be nice to add db_show_zone DDB method and use a now unused uma_print_zone with their counterparts. -- You are receiving this mail because

[Bug 199169] [patch] zone "UMA Zones" has bigger size than need

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199169 --- Comment #2 from luke...@gmail.com --- hi, Dmitry, Thanks for your feedback. That's right, but there is already one uma_cache in the struct uma_zone. Let me do an experiment on sleepq_zone. I have 4-core cpu and the mp_maxid is 3. (kgd

[Bug 199169] [patch] zone "UMA Zones" has bigger size than need

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199169 Dmitry Chagin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcha...@freebsd.org --- Comment #1

[Bug 199169] [patch] zone "UMA Zones" has bigger size than need

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199169 luke...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[patch] zone "UMA Zone" has |[patch] zone "UMA Zones"