[Bug 194604] [libpam] [patch] pam_unix doesn't allow validation of own password

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194604 --- Comment #9 from Dag-Erling Smørgrav --- I meant "your own version of something similar to kcheckpass". Sorry for the late response. For some reason, I didn't get a copy of your comment by email. -- You are receiving this mail becau

[Bug 194604] [libpam] [patch] pam_unix doesn't allow validation of own password

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194604 Dag-Erling Smørgrav changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org|d...@freebsd.org -- You ar

[Bug 194604] [libpam] [patch] pam_unix doesn't allow validation of own password

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194604 --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer --- (In reply to Dag-Erling Smørgrav from comment #7) > If you feel like writing your own version and are comfortable releasing it > under the three-clause BSD license, I may include it in OpenPAM. Sure. T

[Bug 194604] [libpam] [patch] pam_unix doesn't allow validation of own password

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194604 --- Comment #7 from Dag-Erling Smørgrav --- If you feel like writing your own version and are comfortable releasing it under the three-clause BSD license, I may include it in OpenPAM. It won't be available in FreeBSD until 10.2 at the ear

[Bug 194604] [libpam] [patch] pam_unix doesn't allow validation of own password

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194604 --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer --- I'm ok with kcheckpass as a solution, but it must be installable without pulling in all of KDE. I think that's doable. I should make a kcheckpass port; change kde4-workspace plist to exclude kcheckpass a

[Bug 194604] [libpam] [patch] pam_unix doesn't allow validation of own password

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194604 Conrad Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Issue Resolved |In Discussion Resolution|Fe

[Bug 194604] [libpam] [patch] pam_unix doesn't allow validation of own password

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194604 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer --- (In reply to Dag-Erling Smørgrav from comment #2) > Sorry, but no. Use something like kpasswd instead. So, this option then? > we'd prefer more ports shipping > setuid helpers instead of providing one

[Bug 194604] [libpam] [patch] pam_unix doesn't allow validation of own password

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194604 Dag-Erling Smørgrav changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Needs Triage|Issue Resolved

[Bug 194604] [libpam] [patch] pam_unix doesn't allow validation of own password

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194604 --- Comment #3 from Dag-Erling Smørgrav --- Sorry, I meant kcheckpass. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list http:/

[Bug 194604] [libpam] [patch] pam_unix doesn't allow validation of own password

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194604 Conrad Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||security-t...@freebsd.org --- Comme