[Bug 194473] clang built kernels failing to boot on sparc64

2018-03-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194473 craig...@lerwick.hopto.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events

[Bug 194473] clang built kernels failing to boot on sparc64

2014-12-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194473 --- Comment #5 from craig...@lerwick.hopto.org --- Created attachment 150586 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=150586&action=edit changes to clang350-import src to get kernel to build -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 194473] clang built kernels failing to boot on sparc64

2014-12-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194473 --- Comment #4 from craig...@lerwick.hopto.org --- Created attachment 150585 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=150585&action=edit new clang350-import llvm patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the as

[Bug 194473] clang built kernels failing to boot on sparc64

2014-12-13 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194473 --- Comment #3 from craig...@lerwick.hopto.org --- managed to buildkernel with out off tree clang/llvm, but still showing same issue when trying to boot it; lom>poweron lom> LOM event: +8h36m11s host power on ΓΌ

[Bug 194473] clang built kernels failing to boot on sparc64

2014-12-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194473 --- Comment #2 from craig...@lerwick.hopto.org --- unfortunately I can't get clang350-import src building on a 10.1-RELEASE sparc64 box. I have opened up a separate PR for this issue; https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195934

[Bug 194473] clang built kernels failing to boot on sparc64

2014-12-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194473 --- Comment #1 from craig...@lerwick.hopto.org --- Created attachment 150537 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=150537&action=edit proposed clang350-import llvm patch Roman Divacky has suggested to use this llvm patc