[Bug 194466] Update printf(1) to support %T and %q bashisms [patch]

2014-11-04 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194466 --- Comment #3 from Pedro F. Giffuni --- FWIW; I also forwarded the patch to the illumos developer that has been doing work on our shared printf(1) and he was not interested in the %T option either. The %q does have some chance though. -

[Bug 194466] Update printf(1) to support %T and %q bashisms [patch]

2014-11-04 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194466 --- Comment #2 from Mikhail T. --- (In reply to Baptiste Daroussin from comment #1) > Can you also add regression tests about those (we now have regression tests)? Given the skepticism expressed by jilles@ in a private e-mail earlier, prob

[Bug 194466] Update printf(1) to support %T and %q bashisms [patch]

2014-11-04 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194466 Mikhail T. changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Many People -- You are recei

[Bug 194466] Update printf(1) to support %T and %q bashisms [patch]

2014-11-04 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194466 Baptiste Daroussin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b...@freebsd.org --- Comment