https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
k...@tripleback.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|8.4-RELEASE |10.1-RELEASE
--
You are rece
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
k...@tripleback.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Closed |Open
Resolution|Rejec
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #32 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: smh
Date: Fri Oct 3 14:49:50 UTC 2014
New revision: 272474
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/272474
Log:
Fix various issues with zvols
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #31 from Steven Hartland ---
(In reply to kash from comment #30)
> (In reply to Steven Hartland from comment #28)
> > So just to confirm, this does fix your deadlock issue?
> >
> > For reference the current locking for zvol cha
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #30 from k...@tripleback.net ---
(In reply to Steven Hartland from comment #28)
> So just to confirm, this does fix your deadlock issue?
>
> For reference the current locking for zvol changes is actually quite
> specific to Free
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #29 from k...@tripleback.net ---
yes so far it resolves rename-related deadlocks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.or
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #28 from Steven Hartland ---
So just to confirm, this does fix your deadlock issue?
For reference the current locking for zvol changes is actually quite specific
to FreeBSD so not really an upstream issue.
--
You are receivin
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #27 from k...@tripleback.net ---
Thanks for your patience, that's a good enough fix for now, hopefully soon the
locking code can be reworked within OpenZFS to have a generic approach across
Linux, Illumos and FreeBSD.
--
You ar
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
k...@tripleback.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Triage|Issue Resolved
Resolu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #26 from k...@tripleback.net ---
(In reply to Steven Hartland from comment #25)
> (In reply to kash from comment #23)
> > I've been using 10.0-RELEASE for a year with the original patch from this
> > thread. It does work, but not
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #25 from Steven Hartland ---
(In reply to kash from comment #23)
> I've been using 10.0-RELEASE for a year with the original patch from this
> thread. It does work, but not with the new locking patch you created.
There's no oth
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
Steven Hartland changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #147915|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #23 from k...@tripleback.net ---
I've been using 10.0-RELEASE for a year with the original patch from this
thread. It does work, but not with the new locking patch you created.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are th
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #22 from Steven Hartland ---
(In reply to kash from comment #18)
> I've built it but now I don't have /dev/zvol nodes showing up for clones.
That's an issue already fixed in stable, its never worked in 10.0-RELEASE
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #21 from k...@tripleback.net ---
Ok, wasn't sure if that was the intended behaviour - was zvol dev entry
creation purposefully removed?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #20 from Steven Hartland ---
(In reply to kash from comment #19)
> /usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/
> zfs_ioctl.c:1126:11: warning: comparison of constant -1 with expression of
> type 'z
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #19 from k...@tripleback.net ---
/usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_ioctl.c:1126:11:
warning: comparison of constant -1 with expression of type 'zfs_prop_t' is
always false [-Wtautologic
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #18 from k...@tripleback.net ---
I've built it but now I don't have /dev/zvol nodes showing up for clones.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #17 from Steven Hartland ---
(In reply to kash from comment #16)
> The patch does not apply cleanly to a new SVN pull of releng/10.0:
Just retested here against a clean checkout and it does apply for me without
issue.
Are you
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #16 from k...@tripleback.net ---
The patch does not apply cleanly to a new SVN pull of releng/10.0:
[/usr/src]-[root@fbsd-master]-[0]-[1704]
[:)] # cat sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/dsl_dataset.c.rej
@@ -16
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #15 from Steven Hartland ---
-pX is just security patches, that won't effect the main code base.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #14 from k...@tripleback.net ---
Ah, I'm using RELEASE-p7 it seems.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #13 from Steven Hartland ---
In addition the functions these calls are in are: dsl_dataset_promote_sync and
dsl_dataset_rename_snapshot_sync_impl with the new one being added to:
dsl_dataset_promote_sync
--
You are receiving t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #12 from Steven Hartland ---
(In reply to kash from comment #11)
> --- dnode_sync.o ---
> ctfconvert -L VERSION -g dnode_sync.o
> --- dnode.o ---
> ctfconvert -L VERSION -g dnode.o
> --- dsl_dataset.o ---
> /usr/src/sys/modules/
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #11 from k...@tripleback.net ---
--- dnode_sync.o ---
ctfconvert -L VERSION -g dnode_sync.o
--- dnode.o ---
ctfconvert -L VERSION -g dnode.o
--- dsl_dataset.o ---
/usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #10 from Steven Hartland ---
Created attachment 147915
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147915&action=edit
Possible fix for zvol hang issues (against 10.0-RELEASE)
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #9 from k...@tripleback.net ---
Can I get a patch for my RELEASE, because that's the version I filed this bug
against, I don't run STABLE and can't jump to a test version just for one bug..
thanks
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #8 from Steven Hartland ---
(In reply to kash from comment #7)
> Comment on attachment 147905 [details]
> Possible fix for zvol hang issues
>
> This does not compile against 10-RELEASE-pX
Its against stable/10 not release
--
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
--- Comment #7 from k...@tripleback.net ---
Comment on attachment 147905
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147905
Possible fix for zvol hang issues
This does not compile against 10-RELEASE-pX
--
You are receiving t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
Steven Hartland changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #6
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193803
k...@tripleback.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|zvol promote failing|zvol rename failing due to
31 matches
Mail list logo
