https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192487
--- Comment #14 from Ed Maste ---
(In reply to moon300web from comment #13)
Please submit a separate PR
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192487
--- Comment #13 from moon300...@gmx.net ---
I'm updating my laptop's microcode as follows
pkg install devcpu-data-intel
vi /etc/loader.conf
cpu_microcode_load="YES"
cpu_microcode_name="/boot/firmware/06-8e-0c"
(06-8e-0c downloaded from
h
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192487
moon300...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||moon300...@gmx.net
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192487
Oleksandr Tymoshenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||go...@freebsd.org
R
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192487
--- Comment #10 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: emaste
Date: Wed Oct 10 15:54:01 UTC 2018
New revision: 339287
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/339287
Log:
MFC r333569: cpucontrol: imp
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192487
--- Comment #9 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: emaste
Date: Sat May 12 15:34:35 UTC 2018
New revision: 333569
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/333569
Log:
cpucontrol: improve Intel mic
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192487
--- Comment #8 from Stefan B. ---
Ed, this would be great.
May I point you at another issue: in the current implementation, the
eval_cpu_features system call output from cpuctl.ko goes to the console,
spamming a half screenful of informati
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192487
--- Comment #7 from Ed Maste ---
> As the cpucontrol program was paid work sponsored by the FreeBSD foundation,
This is untrue; the Foundation sponsored changes to cpucontrol as part of other
work but the program already existed.
I will t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192487
Dan Lukes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dan+freebsd@obluda.cz
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192487
--- Comment #6 from Dan Lukes ---
Created attachment 191851
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=191851&action=edit
Patch for cpuctl to read Intel CPU revision correctly
See comment #4 for details
--
You are receivin
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192487
--- Comment #5 from Dan Lukes ---
Created attachment 191850
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=191850&action=edit
Patch for cpucontrol to read Intel CPU revision correctly
See comment #4 for details
--
You are rece
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192487
--- Comment #3 from Stefan B. ---
(In reply to Mitchell Horne from comment #2)
The PR is *not* about the updater code in the cpuctl module.
It is about the missing initialization in microprocessor detection code in
cpucontrol, which is ex
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192487
Mitchell Horne changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhorne...@gmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192487
--- Comment #1 from Stefan B. ---
(In reply to Henrique de Moraes Holschuh from comment #0)
> the impact of getting garbage from MSR_BIOS_SIGN includes ...
> ... incorrectly refusing to upgrade microcode.
This is confirmed.
As the cpucon
14 matches
Mail list logo
