https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275099
WHR changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #246324|text/x-c|text/x-csrc
mime type|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=270798
WHR changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msl023...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275099
WHR changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #246324|text/plain |text/x-c
mime type|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275099
--- Comment #1 from WHR ---
Created attachment 246325
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=246325&action=edit
Proposed fix
cat(1) should fallback to the read(2) system call if copy_file_range(2) failed
with EISDIR.
--
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275099
Bug ID: 275099
Summary: cat(1) can't read directories
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275086
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||regression
--
You are receiving th
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275093
--- Comment #7 from Enji Cooper ---
Also, yeah... deleting the invalid tag seems prudent.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275093
--- Comment #6 from Enji Cooper ---
I think it's ok to use the NTP embedded copy now since we only have a single
libevent consumer in-tree..
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275093
--- Comment #5 from Cy Schubert ---
Do you see any problem with git tag -d vendor/libevent/2.1.18 ? Is that
acceptable in the FreeBSD sense? That is after git tag -a vendor/libevent/2.1.8
before the import of 2.1.12. Does this make sense to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275093
--- Comment #4 from Ed Maste ---
(In reply to Cy Schubert from comment #3)
Yes it should be 2.1.8.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275093
--- Comment #3 from Cy Schubert ---
That's what I think.
The merge was clean. Build already in progress.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275093
Herbert J. Skuhra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||herb...@gojira.at
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275093
--- Comment #1 from Cy Schubert ---
Looking at our vendor branch tags, our libevent is at 2.1.18 while upstream
libevent.org is at 2.1.12.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275086
Warner Losh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275093
Bug ID: 275093
Summary: contrib/libevent is woefully out of date
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: A
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275092
Bug ID: 275092
Summary: iostat columns run together
Product: Base System
Version: 15.0-CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects O
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275086
Bug ID: 275086
Summary: Old i386 boot: CPU0: local APIC error 0x4 – Cannot
boot any longer
Product: Base System
Version: 14.0-RELEASE
Hardware: i386
O
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275081
--- Comment #2 from Dave Cottlehuber ---
I don't think this has any of the expected info sadly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275081
--- Comment #1 from Dave Cottlehuber ---
Created attachment 246311
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=246311&action=edit
sh -x /usr/local/bin/poudriere jail -c -j 14_0_x64 -v 14.0-RELEASE -K GENERIC
2>&1 | tee /tmp/w
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275063
martin.dierin...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||mfc-stable13?
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275081
Bug ID: 275081
Summary: freebsd-update erroneously reports that 14.0-RELEASE
is approaching its EOL date
Product: Base System
Version: 14.0-RELEASE
Hardware: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266990
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Korobkov ---
In 14.0-RELEASE it still works well, but new message appeared: "ns8250: UART
FCR is broken". What does it mean?
# dmesg.boot
puc0: port
0x1000-0x103f,0x1040-0x104f mem 0xba00-0xba000fff irq 27 a
22 matches
Mail list logo