https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266868
--- Comment #2 from Baptiste Daroussin ---
have you reported this upstream?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274246
--- Comment #1 from Baptiste Daroussin ---
upstream will never accept a version parameter as far as I can tell, at least
this is the case for most things that comes out of openbsd. (Maybe you can ask
Ingo he may have an opinion)
--
You ar
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274449
Graham Perrin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|host(1) Incorrect |host(1) Incorrect
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274449
Bug ID: 274449
Summary: host(1) Incorrect apostrophe usage in manual page
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
S
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274424
--- Comment #1 from wildzan...@gmail.com ---
Appendix:
By pressing the "PrintScreen" key, the tty are switched sequentially, namely:
ttyv0 > ttyv1 > ttyv2 > ttyv3 > ttyv4 > ttyv5 > ttyv6 > ttyv7. Then the key
does nothing.
Pressing F5 displ
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239389
--- Comment #7 from Maigurs Stalidzans ---
BTW I am on 15.0-CURRENT
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239389
--- Comment #6 from Maigurs Stalidzans ---
The issue first appeared some two months ago but with some port shuffling it
went away few times. When I successfully installed a configured Xen and on
first boot it appeared again but this time no
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274352
Cy Schubert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|c...@freebsd.org
--
You are receivi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274352
--- Comment #3 from Cy Schubert ---
(In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #2)
I just got back from vacation today. The patch has been imported into vendor
and I'll test it here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assign
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239389
Maigurs Stalidzans changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||neims...@gmx.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274423
Mark Johnston changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@freebsd.org,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274352
Mark Johnston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Open
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274440
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
Keywords
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274440
Bug ID: 274440
Summary: ice: ice0: Failed to set LAN Tx queue
Product: Base System
Version: 13.2-RELEASE
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274316
--- Comment #4 from Ed Maste ---
(In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #3)
They won't be aligned to sizeof(cpuset_t) indeed, but I expect they need only
8-byte alignment (i.e., alignof(long)), right?
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274306
--- Comment #4 from Kristof Provost ---
(In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #3)
I'd prefer this: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42170 because that'll fix
everything. I've already run into this issue in carp and pf, and I'm not
confident t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268699
Shawn Anastasio changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sanastasio@raptorengineerin
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274434
Bug ID: 274434
Summary: HTMLDOCS for CXGBE(4) has an incorrect link to
ng_ether(4) in all versions from 9.0
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274388
Mark Johnston changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274306
--- Comment #3 from Mark Johnston ---
(In reply to Kristof Provost from comment #2)
That looks good to me if you want to commit it.
I don't see any problem with including opt_netlink.h in netlink.h. Assuming
that this problem exists in st
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274316
Mark Johnston changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274306
--- Comment #2 from Kristof Provost ---
diff --git a/sys/netlink/netlink_sysevent.c b/sys/netlink/netlink_sysevent.c
index 01d0837b14d2..e3abdd688e66 100644
--- a/sys/netlink/netlink_sysevent.c
+++ b/sys/netlink/netlink_sysevent.c
@@ -25,6
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274306
Mark Johnston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Open
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264981
Mark Johnston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274426
Graham Perrin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
Statu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274426
Bug ID: 274426
Summary: route get command returns a zero even no route is
found
Product: Base System
Version: 14.0-CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
26 matches
Mail list logo
