https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272878
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||crash
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272965
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272966
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272077
--- Comment #3 from Kyle Evans ---
Created attachment 244259
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=244259&action=edit
Proposed patch
> - if the list of kernels is empty after attempted enumeration
> - initialize it to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272077
Dag-Erling Smørgrav changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272944
--- Comment #5 from jsml4thwwbid6...@protonmail.com ---
(In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #4)
Hello Mark,
Please see the emailed video. It shows a sixty second iperf3 test with the
output of top in the jail, and on the host.
This t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273263
--- Comment #3 from Slawomir Wojciech Wojtczak ---
Created attachment 244256
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=244256&action=edit
WITHOUT_ISPFW.tar.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee fo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273263
--- Comment #2 from Slawomir Wojciech Wojtczak ---
Created attachment 244255
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=244255&action=edit
WITH_ISPFW.tar.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273263
--- Comment #1 from Slawomir Wojciech Wojtczak ---
Created attachment 244254
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=244254&action=edit
DEBUG_WITHOUT_ISPFW.tar.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assig
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273263
Bug ID: 273263
Summary: isp(4): 32Gbit Qlogic cards do not work
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272944
--- Comment #4 from Mark Johnston ---
(In reply to jSML4ThWwBID69YC from comment #2)
Hmm, that's a bit surprising. If you look at "top -SHza" output while the
benchmark is running, do you see an epair thread consuming 100% of a CPU?
There
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271982
kikadf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271982
--- Comment #1 from kikadf ---
Fixed with review D41151.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273207
--- Comment #27 from Franco Fichtner ---
For reference: https://docs.freebsd.org/en/articles/pr-guidelines/
"Jane Random BugBuster confirms that the bug report has sufficient information
to be reproducible. ***If not, she goes back and for
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273207
--- Comment #26 from Franco Fichtner ---
Fair enough. Apology accepted. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273207
--- Comment #25 from Kristof Provost ---
(In reply to Franco Fichtner from comment #24)
Franco, I will continue to close bugs which have not been demonstrated on
freebsd. I will not continue this argument.
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273207
--- Comment #24 from Franco Fichtner ---
> That would be the bit where this website says “freebsd.org” rather than
> opnsense.
I get you are trying to sound assertive, but the fact of the matter is this is
unmodified code and obviously i
17 matches
Mail list logo