https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241918
--- Comment #1 from oklas...@gmail.com ---
This problem exists even for this command (with MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj):
```
make MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj DESTDIR=/home/rj/RELENG_12_1.tmpl distrib-dirs
distribution
```
However for this comm
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242067
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mho...@freebsd.org
Fl
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242067
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||maintainer-feedback?(br@Fre
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242067
--- Comment #2 from Dennis Clarke ---
Created attachment 209240
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=209240&action=edit
Assemble , compile and link and check results.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are th
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242067
Dennis Clarke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People
Hard
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242067
Bug ID: 242067
Summary: r354823 riscv64 libC has a fault in printf() where
IEEE754-2008 fp128 data is output wrong
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225799
--- Comment #6 from tedno...@bellsouth.net ---
This issue is fixed by R12.1 (and I presume 12.0, though I did not try it).
It still exists in 11.x up through 11.3.
I have upgraded to 12.1, so I can no longer easily test any proposed fixes.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241710
--- Comment #15 from Pedro F. Giffuni ---
(In reply to Konstantin Belousov from comment #14)
Ugh.. yes, illustrating my ignorance on the subject, I confirm memory is
unaffected.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assigne
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241710
--- Comment #14 from Konstantin Belousov ---
(In reply to Pedro F. Giffuni from comment #13)
It is rather useless. The issue is not a memory, but KVA which is completely
different resource.
Also, on i386 we have 4/4 split, which gives the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241710
--- Comment #13 from Pedro F. Giffuni ---
For the record ...
I am currently testing on an i386 VM with 2G RAM, and after the kernel rebuilds
(it's slow), I'll start starving the main memory in the VM.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241973
--- Comment #1 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: markj
Date: Mon Nov 18 19:05:53 UTC 2019
New revision: 354824
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/354824
Log:
Fix grammar in gpart.8.
PR:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207854
--- Comment #2 from Gleb Popov ---
Bump.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241710
--- Comment #12 from Pedro F. Giffuni ---
(In reply to Konstantin Belousov from comment #11)
> (In reply to Pedro F. Giffuni from comment #10)
> 2048 is a strange multiplicator.
I can write it 2 * 1024. I looked around and I noticed the va
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241118
Chris R changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cr+free...@glass-box.net
--- Comment #22
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241710
--- Comment #11 from Konstantin Belousov ---
(In reply to Pedro F. Giffuni from comment #10)
2048 is a strange multiplicator.
But you still ignore the crucial question: does increase cause issues for KVA
starved arches. If it is not, then
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242056
Bug ID: 242056
Summary: bsnmpd: ipv4 addresses in begemotSnmpdTransInetStatus
table are reversed
Product: Base System
Version: 12.1-RELEASE
Hardware: Any
16 matches
Mail list logo
