https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205873
Kristof Provost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212013
Kristof Provost changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@freebsd.org
Resolut
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231187
Benedict Reuschling changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|b...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232463
Bug ID: 232463
Summary: EBR slice cannot be added partitions to
Product: Base System
Version: 10.4-RELEASE
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severit
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203976
Kristof Provost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
S
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232313
--- Comment #13 from Kirk McKusick ---
(In reply to Glen Barber from comment #10)
If there is an easy way to create 10Gb images in addition to the 30Gb images
for the folks that want to use 10Gb images on the cloud, then that would be my
fi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232313
--- Comment #12 from Sylvain Garrigues ---
Just realized that, for EC2 images, UFS partition size is overriden in
release/tools/ec2.conf per Colin Percival commit.
He wrote:
# Build with a 3 GB UFS partition; the growfs rc.d script will e
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114567
Kristof Provost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122014
Kristof Provost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Feedback Timeout
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=141905
Kristof Provost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|Closed
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=140697
Kristof Provost changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@freebsd.org
Resolut
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=158557
Kristof Provost changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@freebsd.org
Sta
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=160370
Kristof Provost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
S
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168952
Kristof Provost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232459
Bug ID: 232459
Summary: 12.0-STABLE buildworld fails in VMWare Fusion guest
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232458
Bug ID: 232458
Summary: jevents: Program terminated with signal 11,
Segmentation fault when build word of 12-STABLE
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: am
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232456
--- Comment #1 from Lucas Kanashiro ---
I can also reproduce this issue using FreeBSD 11 image available in GCE.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
fre
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232456
Lucas Kanashiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|Any |amd64
Keywords|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232456
Bug ID: 232456
Summary: release/tools/gce.conf: cannot query NTP because of
the non resolved hostname
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232451
Lev A. Serebryakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232451
Lev A. Serebryakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||IntelNetworking
--
You are r
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232451
Bug ID: 232451
Summary: [igb] I210 NIC can not send more than ~670Mbit/s with
flow control enabled.
Product: Base System
Version: 11.2-STABLE
Hardware: amd64
[[HEADLINE]]
[[PERMALINK_FULL_LINK]]
TITLE OF YOUR EMAIL
The content of your email goes here.
You can drag and drop blocks of text, images or other content elements to add
them to your message. Customize the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228169
peter.sopko+freebsd@backbone.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter.sopko+fr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232313
--- Comment #11 from Sylvain Garrigues ---
(In reply to Glen Barber from comment #10)
I agree it is not a bug per se, but rather a comment on the commit which
increased the size of all VMs by 10GB (50% increase) per Kirk’s request who
noti
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232313
--- Comment #10 from Glen Barber ---
(In reply to Sylvain Garrigues from comment #9)
> I just hope this will be "solved" before 12.0-RELEASE is out, so that
> anybody can use the new release on Google Cloud.
To be honest, the response in c
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232313
--- Comment #9 from Sylvain Garrigues ---
I just hope this will be "solved" before 12.0-RELEASE is out, so that anybody
can use the new release on Google Cloud.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231965
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://reviews.freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229830
--- Comment #5 from Bertrand Petit ---
(In reply to Jan Kokemüller from comment #2)
Jan, your program do trigger the assertion failure, maybe one time in ten.
I have nothing better to provide as the bug was discovered when runing a huge
job
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232313
--- Comment #8 from Sylvain Garrigues ---
(In reply to Kirk McKusick from comment #7)
Thanks, then I guess Glen could reduce the size a little with a new commit.
But still, I am wondering why we keep VM image sizes this big. Not everybod
30 matches
Mail list logo