[Bug 204504] [patch] Small C++ new/delete operator mismatch in groff's code

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204504 Yuri Pankov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yur...@gmx.com --- Comment #1 from Y

[Bug 224136] ZFS send: recursive snapshot pruning broken by r302653 (Illumos 6111).

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224136 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://svnweb.freebsd.org/

[Bug 222199] zfs command crashed with option checksum=skein

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222199 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org|freebsd...@freebsd.org -- You are

[Bug 211771] kernel panic when loading ix interface ( was kernel panic on boot PowerEdge R720xd )

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211771 Gabriel Zellmer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@zellmers.com --- Comment #1

[Bug 222199] zfs command crashed with option checksum=skein

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222199 Yuri Pankov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yur...@gmx.com --- Comment #4 from Y

[Bug 219213] powerd causing problems with ryzen

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219213 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ko...@freebsd.org |freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org --- Comme

[Bug 219213] powerd causing problems with ryzen

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219213 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Closed |In Progress Resolution|FIX

[Bug 224136] ZFS send: recursive snapshot pruning broken by r302653 (Illumos 6111).

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224136 Bug ID: 224136 Summary: ZFS send: recursive snapshot pruning broken by r302653 (Illumos 6111). Product: Base System Version: 11.0-RELEASE Hardware: Any

[Bug 219900] tr class and unicode collation

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219900 --- Comment #3 from Yuri Pankov --- WRT the tr issue -- that's what 'tr' on Debian GNU/Linux has to say about it: $ echo test | tr '[:alpha:]' '[:upper:]' tr: misaligned [:upper:] and/or [:lower:] construct -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 223803] zio_done() panic on system with cache devices

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223803 Shiva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shiva.bhanu...@quorum.com --- Comment #1 f

[Bug 219900] tr class and unicode collation

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219900 Yuri Pankov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yur...@gmx.com --- Comment #2 from Y

[Bug 210415] vidcontrol -h does not work with vt(4)

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210415 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||mfc-stable9-, |

[Bug 210415] vidcontrol -h does not work with vt(4)

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210415 --- Comment #2 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: emaste Date: Tue Dec 5 22:20:00 UTC 2017 New revision: 326599 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/326599 Log: Implement "vidcontrol -h " fo

[Bug 224126] rc.d/ntpd outputs fetch usage syntax (stable/11)

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224126 Cy Schubert changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org|c...@freebsd.org -- You are receivi

[Bug 224126] rc.d/ntpd outputs fetch usage syntax (stable/11)

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224126 Jeremy Chadwick changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asom...@freebsd.org,

[Bug 224126] rc.d/ntpd outputs fetch usage syntax (stable/11)

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224126 --- Comment #2 from Jeremy Chadwick --- I believe this problem may be related to the following commit, but unsure; gut feeling says very likely: http://www.freshbsd.org/commit/freebsd/r325256 -- You are receiving this mail because: You a

[Bug 224126] rc.d/ntpd outputs fetch usage syntax (stable/11)

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224126 --- Comment #1 from Jeremy Chadwick --- Few things to add for clarification: 1. The very long stall IS NOT caused by sleep(1). It's caused by the model of piping used with awk, best I can tell, 2. I've since modified /etc/periodic.conf,

[Bug 224126] rc.d/ntpd outputs fetch usage syntax (stable/11)

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224126 Bug ID: 224126 Summary: rc.d/ntpd outputs fetch usage syntax (stable/11) Product: Base System Version: 11.0-STABLE Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New

[Bug 223517] The man(1) manual page has no mention about the exit status of the command

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223517 --- Comment #1 from Wolfram Schneider --- the POSIX man(1) page http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/man.html EXIT STATUS The following exit values shall be returned: 0 Successful completion. >0

[Bug 224116] STP Frames are ignored

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org|freebsd-...@freebsd.org -- You are

Re: bugzilla search is driving me crazy

2017-12-05 Thread Wolfram Schneider
On 5 December 2017 at 19:21, Wolfram Schneider wrote: > Hi, > > I used the bugzilla search at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ > > I searched for "linuxism" > > In the search box top left I get zero hits: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=linuxism > > I clicked on the r

bugzilla search is driving me crazy

2017-12-05 Thread Wolfram Schneider
Hi, I used the bugzilla search at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ I searched for "linuxism" In the search box top left I get zero hits: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=linuxism I clicked on the result page on "Start a new search" and a page with "Simple Search" and

[Bug 219900] tr class and unicode collation

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219900 Lars Engels changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 224116] STP Frames are ignored

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116 --- Comment #1 from Michael Neese --- Created attachment 188557 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=188557&action=edit pciconf -lv -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___

[Bug 224116] STP Frames are ignored

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116 --- Comment #2 from Michael Neese --- Created attachment 188558 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=188558&action=edit sysctl -a | grep ix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___

[Bug 224116] STP Frames are ignored

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116 Bug ID: 224116 Summary: STP Frames are ignored Product: Base System Version: 11.1-RELEASE Hardware: amd64 OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Many

[Bug 210858] tput setaf and tput setab not setting any color

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210858 Julian Elischer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jul...@freebsd.org --- Comment #

[Bug 223770] After FreeBSD 11.1 Update: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223770 --- Comment #4 from Torsten Zuehlsdorff --- (In reply to Toshimichi Masubuchi from comment #3) > It may be resolved by adding the kern.cam.scsi_delay option. > Please see bug #220923, comment #17. I tested the option with various values,