date:20160905

[Bug 212396] Dual ifconfig DHCP entries in rc.conf from install

2016-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212396 Bug ID: 212396 Summary: Dual ifconfig DHCP entries in rc.conf from install Product: Base System Version: CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New S

[Bug 212390] OpenSSH SSHD should disable weak algorithms

2016-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212390 Bug ID: 212390 Summary: OpenSSH SSHD should disable weak algorithms Product: Base System Version: 11.0-STABLE Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Seve

[Bug 212318] sysutils/fusefs-libs: fails to unmount due to a uniq dev node

2016-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212318 --- Comment #2 from Ben RUBSON --- Thank you for your feedback Melvyn. Every mount/unmount is done by users themselves, not by root. Look, in my example, when user3 tries to unmount, fuse tries to unmount FS of another user (user2 in my ex

[Bug 211699] 11.0-BETA4 installer hangs on Dell CS23-SH

2016-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211699 --- Comment #11 from Eric van Gyzen --- Out of curiosity, what model system is this? (kenv smbios.system.product) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ f

[Bug 211699] 11.0-BETA4 installer hangs on Dell CS23-SH

2016-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211699 Eric van Gyzen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vangy...@freebsd.org --- Comment

[Bug 212331] pfil processing order

2016-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212331 --- Comment #6 from srijannandi --- I am facing the exact issue faced by Alexey. This was reported way back in 2010, do we have a fix or a workaround for this yet. https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2010-July/005739.html -- Y

[Bug 212331] pfil processing order

2016-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212331 --- Comment #5 from srijannandi --- According to this post, http://deadloop.blogspot.in/2010/04/who-comes-first-ipfw-or-pf.html I have ipfw process packets first and then pf. As soon as 'route-to' is added to pf, it breaks this order and

[Bug 212331] pfil processing order

2016-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212331 --- Comment #4 from srijannandi --- With route-to, I can have a multi gateway rule. This multi-gateway acts for load balancing or failover. So, in case a gateway fails, the connections will be handled by the active gateway. Or else, it woul

[Bug 212331] pfil processing order

2016-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212331 --- Comment #3 from Kristof Provost --- (In reply to srijannandi from comment #2) What are you trying to accomplish with the route-to rule? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 212384] pfsync(4) bulk update fail

2016-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212384 Bug ID: 212384 Summary: pfsync(4) bulk update fail Product: Base System Version: 10.3-STABLE Hardware: amd64 OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects O

[Bug 212331] pfil processing order

2016-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212331 --- Comment #2 from srijannandi --- Any workaround to get this working? I really need this running. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@fr