[Bug 206585] hpt_set_info possible buffer overflow

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206585 CTurt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Open|Closed Resolution|---

[Bug 206585] hpt_set_info possible buffer overflow

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206585 --- Comment #1 from CTurt --- These sizes are defined as `DWORD`, a `typedef` for `unsigned int`, rather than a 64bit type like `size_t`, so getting the sum of both sizes to overflow doesn't seem possible. -- You are receiving this mail b

[Bug 206579] arm(4): Multiple vulnerabilities in AMR ioctl handler

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206579 --- Comment #2 from CTurt --- This code could be explained if `addr` can be either a user or kernel pointer depending on `cmd`, but I'd like this to be confirmed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _

[Bug 206551] Heap overflow in iconv kernel module

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206551 Jilles Tjoelker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jil...@freebsd.org --- Comment #

Problem reports for freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org that need special attention

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and ob

[Bug 206551] Heap overflow in iconv kernel module

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206551 CTurt changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |Not A Bug Status|Open

[Bug 206585] hpt_set_info possible buffer overflow

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206585 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-qa, security Sta

[Bug 206585] hpt_set_info possible buffer overflow

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206585 Bug ID: 206585 Summary: hpt_set_info possible buffer overflow Product: Base System Version: 11.0-CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity:

[Bug 206584] Possible integer overflow in update_intel

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206584 Konstantin Belousov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@freebsd.org

[Bug 206583] Unable to load ip_mroute kernel module if VIMAGE is enabled in kernel

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206583 Marko Zec changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org|z...@freebsd.org CC|

[Bug 204097] witness_initialize() does not perform bound checking of witness_count

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204097 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-patch, needs-qa,

[Bug 206583] Unable to load ip_mroute kernel module if VIMAGE is enabled in kernel

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206583 --- Comment #2 from Ben Woods --- It is worth noting that building a kernel with VIMAGE and MROUTING both enabled seems to work fine. This problem only appears when multicast routing is not built into the kernel with the MROUTING option, bu

[Bug 206584] Possible integer overflow in update_intel

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206584 --- Comment #1 from CTurt --- Sorry, my bad. It is checked right here: if (args->size > UCODE_SIZE_MAX) { I'll spend more time analysing before reporting in the future. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee f

[Bug 206583] Unable to load ip_mroute kernel module if VIMAGE is enabled in kernel

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206583 --- Comment #1 from Ben Woods --- Some information provided by Marko Zec on the freebsd-...@freebsd.org mailing list: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2016-January/07.html In this particular case the problem is that ip_m

[Bug 206584] Possible integer overflow in update_intel

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206584 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sect...@freebsd.org St

[Bug 206584] Possible integer overflow in update_intel

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206584 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||mfc-stable9?, mfc-stable10? -- Yo

[Bug 206584] Possible integer overflow in update_intel

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206584 Bug ID: 206584 Summary: Possible integer overflow in update_intel Product: Base System Version: 11.0-CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Sever

[Bug 206573] Improper userland pointer handling in aacraid

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206573 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|--- |Normal Status|New

[Bug 206579] arm(4): Multiple vulnerabilities in AMR ioctl handler

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206579 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Open -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug 206551] Heap overflow in iconv kernel module

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206551 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Open -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug 206579] arm(4): Multiple vulnerabilities in AMR ioctl handler

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206579 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People Sum

[Bug 206581] bxe_ioctl_nvram handler is faulty

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206581 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|--- |Normal Status|New

[Bug 206583] Unable to load ip_mroute kernel module if VIMAGE is enabled in kernel

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206583 Bug ID: 206583 Summary: Unable to load ip_mroute kernel module if VIMAGE is enabled in kernel Product: Base System Version: 11.0-CURRENT Hardware: Any

[Bug 206581] bxe_ioctl_nvram handler is faulty

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206581 --- Comment #1 from CTurt --- Sorry, forgot about the check: if (len > sizeof(struct bxe_nvram_data)) { So, the example I suggested wouldn't work. But the lack of `copyin` being checked, is still valid. And there probably should be s

[Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206528 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Open --- Comment #6 from Kubilay K

[Bug 206581] bxe_ioctl_nvram handler is faulty

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206581 Bug ID: 206581 Summary: bxe_ioctl_nvram handler is faulty Product: Base System Version: 11.0-CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Aff

[Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206528 --- Comment #5 from Olli Hauer --- I forgot the change from gcc to clang already. oce.ko is a static module, and even it works I wouldn't trust in production without a vendor statement. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206528 --- Comment #4 from Ron --- I will give it a shot shortly, last time I tried this I had failures due to the change from gcc to clang. Will report back shortly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 206579] Multiple vulnerabilities in AMR ioctl handler

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206579 --- Comment #1 from CTurt --- Forgot to mention, the file is `sys/dev/amr/amr.c`. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing l

[Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206528 --- Comment #3 from Olli Hauer --- Hi Ron, you are right no download for 10.x, but there is a driver for 9.3 in the old pkg format. I'm not sure if it will work on 10.x and for FC but maybe give it a try. Perhaps Koobs or another Bugzilla

[Bug 206579] Multiple vulnerabilities in AMR ioctl handler

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206579 Bug ID: 206579 Summary: Multiple vulnerabilities in AMR ioctl handler Product: Base System Version: 11.0-CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New S

[Bug 206573] Improper userland pointer handling in aacraid

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206573 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-qa, patch URL

[Bug 206573] Improper userland pointer handling in aacraid

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206573 --- Comment #1 from CTurt --- I've committed a patch to HardenedBSD: https://github.com/HardenedBSD/hardenedBSD-playground/commit/48d6f11271b93a265184de813e32dba8f5cf76f9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for th

[Bug 206573] Improper userland pointer handling in aacraid

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206573 Bug ID: 206573 Summary: Improper userland pointer handling in aacraid Product: Base System Version: 11.0-CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New S

[Bug 206567] [msk] msk0: watchdog timeout - 88E8053 on i386

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206567 Bug ID: 206567 Summary: [msk] msk0: watchdog timeout - 88E8053 on i386 Product: Base System Version: 9.3-STABLE Hardware: i386 OS: Any Status: New S

[Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206528 --- Comment #2 from Ron --- I looked there before opening the case, for me I just see this under download: "Ethernet Driver - Use inbox driver" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206528 Olli Hauer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oha...@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug 206551] Heap overflow in iconv kernel module

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206551 --- Comment #3 from CTurt --- In the disassembly of `libiconv.so`, the check is performed on an `unsigned int` for some reason: unsigned int v24; ... && v24 <= 0x41000 I'm not sure why this is, considering the type of `ia_data

[Bug 206551] Heap overflow in iconv kernel module

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206551 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-patch, needs-qa,

[Bug 206536] Warnings during buildworld possibly affecting build of up-to-date make

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206536 --- Comment #2 from Dave Evans --- The host I was building on was FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #3 r294529 amd64 which I built about 3 days ago. The target I was building for was stable/9 i386 svn info reports in my src directory: Revision: 2945

[Bug 206516] [patch] Teach ofw_bus_parse_xref_list_alloc to be able to return the length of the parsed list

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206516 --- Comment #1 from Stanislav Galabov --- This bug is now followed at: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5043 Will continue work there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 206551] Heap overflow in iconv kernel module

2016-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206551 --- Comment #2 from CTurt --- It's worth noting that the minimum size which can be passed for a signed 32bit integer is `-0x7fff`, which wraps around to `0x8001`. If on FreeBSD 9, when this size goes through `malloc` it wil