Re: kern/175674: sem_open() should use O_EXLOCK with open() instead of a separate flock() call

2013-02-03 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, Eitan Adler wrote: On 3 February 2013 16:00, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: The following reply was made to PR kern/175674; it has been noted by GNATS. > The best way to fix this is in kern_openat() in the kernel but this > might cause compatibility issues. Not sure if there wo

Re: kern/175674: sem_open() should use O_EXLOCK with open() instead of a separate flock() call

2013-02-03 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > For a reason unknown to me, open(2) does not restart but always > returns [EINTR] when a signal is caught. This is not POSIX-compliant. Actually, it is restarting that would be POSIX-non-compliant. From an old POSIX draft: @ 27392 ERRORS @ 27393

Re: kern/175674: sem_open() should use O_EXLOCK with open() instead of a separate flock() call

2013-02-03 Thread Eitan Adler
The following reply was made to PR kern/175674; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eitan Adler To: bug-followup Cc: Subject: Re: kern/175674: sem_open() should use O_EXLOCK with open() instead of a separate flock() call Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 21:30:28 -0500 -- Forwarded message --

Re: kern/175674: sem_open() should use O_EXLOCK with open() instead of a separate flock() call

2013-02-03 Thread David Xu
The following reply was made to PR kern/175674; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Xu To: Jilles Tjoelker Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , Jukka Ukkonen , freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/175674: sem_open() should use O_EXLOCK with open() instead of a separate flock() call

Re: kern/175674: sem_open() should use O_EXLOCK with open() instead of a separate flock() call

2013-02-03 Thread David Xu
The following reply was made to PR kern/175674; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Xu To: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: Jukka Ukkonen , freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org, jil...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/175674: sem_open() should use O_EXLOCK with open() instead of a separate flock() ca

Re: kern/175674: sem_open() should use O_EXLOCK with open() instead of a separate flock() call

2013-02-03 Thread Eitan Adler
On 3 February 2013 16:00, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > The following reply was made to PR kern/175674; it has been noted by GNATS. > > The best way to fix this is in kern_openat() in the kernel but this > > might cause compatibility issues. > > Not sure if there would be serious compatibility pro

Re: conf/19573: Dot Files for Optional Shells

2013-02-03 Thread eadler
Synopsis: Dot Files for Optional Shells State-Changed-From-To: suspended->open State-Changed-By: eadler State-Changed-When: Mon Feb 4 01:05:16 UTC 2013 State-Changed-Why: I just don't have time to deal with this Responsible-Changed-From-To: eadler->freebsd-bugs Responsible-Changed-By: eadler Re

Re: kern/175674: sem_open() should use O_EXLOCK with open() instead of a separate flock() call

2013-02-03 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
The following reply was made to PR kern/175674; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Jilles Tjoelker Cc: Jukka Ukkonen , freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org, davi...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/175674: sem_open() should use O_EXLOCK with open() instead of a separate fl

Re: kern/175674: sem_open() should use O_EXLOCK with open() instead of a separate flock() call

2013-02-03 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
The following reply was made to PR kern/175674; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jilles Tjoelker To: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: Jukka Ukkonen , freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org, davi...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/175674: sem_open() should use O_EXLOCK with open() instead of a separate fl

Re: bin/175799: Adding more tools to be used by operator group members (reboot, apm, acpiconf)

2013-02-03 Thread Olivier Cochard-Labbé
The following reply was made to PR bin/175799; it has been noted by GNATS. From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: bin/175799: Adding more tools to be used by operator group members (reboot, apm, acpiconf) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 15:54:53 +0

bin/175799: Adding more tools to be used by operator group members (reboot, apm, acpiconf)

2013-02-03 Thread Olivier Cochard-Labbe
>Number: 175799 >Category: bin >Synopsis: Adding more tools to be used by operator group members >(reboot, apm, acpiconf) >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible:freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: