>Number: 175343
>Category: misc
>Synopsis: rsyslog 7 won't build, missing json/json.h
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class:
>Number: 175339
>Category: misc
>Synopsis: ldd runs linux binaries instead of printing shared library
>dependencies
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>D
Old Synopsis: fusefs kernel page fault
New Synopsis: [panic] fusefs kernel page fault
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->freebsd-bugs
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jan 15 22:48:47 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
reclassify.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/qu
Synopsis: newsyslog R flag ignored
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->markj
Responsible-Changed-By: markj
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jan 15 21:49:25 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I will take this.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=175330
__
The following reply was made to PR bin/175330; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mark Johnston
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, pproca...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: bin/175330: newsyslog R flag ignored
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:45:52 -0500
Hm, I can't seem to reproduce this on CURRENT or using t
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Motin
To: Allen Landsidel
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:37:55 +0200
On 15.01.2013 20:53, Allen
>Number: 175330
>Category: bin
>Synopsis: newsyslog R flag ignored
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-I
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Allen Landsidel
To: Alexander Motin
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:53:58 -0500
On 1/15/2013 13:10, Alexand
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Motin
To: Allen Landsidel
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:10:56 +0200
On 15.01.2013 19:09, Allen
Synopsis: [asmc] [patch] add support for Macbook 3.1
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->adrian
Responsible-Changed-By: adrian
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jan 15 17:42:06 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'll snaffle this.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=175260
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Allen Landsidel
To: Alexander Motin
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:09:29 -0500
The atacontrol(8) man page
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Motin
To: Allen Landsidel
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:35:43 +0200
Please, be my guest to show
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Allen Landsidel
To: Alexander Motin
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:26:43 -0500
Holy crap.
The PR is abo
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Allen Landsidel
To: Alexander Motin
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:22:00 -0500
Your solution then is to re
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Motin
To: Allen Landsidel
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:20:56 +0200
On 15.01.2013 18:03, Allen
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Motin
To: Allen Landsidel
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:25:14 +0200
At what point have we talke
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Allen Landsidel
To: Alexander Motin
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:03:16 -0500
I'm also extremely interest
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Allen Landsidel
To: Alexander Motin
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:00:22 -0500
I don't know of a single RA
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Motin
To: Allen Landsidel
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:55:57 +0200
Their on-disk formats are i
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Allen Landsidel
To: Alexander Motin
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:28:53 -0500
Most devices typically only
The following reply was made to PR kern/175323; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: =?UTF-8?B?0JDQu9C10LrRgdC10Lkg0JLQvtC70LrQvtCy?=
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
=?UTF-8?B?0JDQu9C10LrRgdC10Lkg0JLQvtC70LrQvtCy?=
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/175323: Fail to use ZVOL as a gmirror component
Date:
The following reply was made to PR kern/175323; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: =?UTF-8?B?0JDQu9C10LrRgdC10Lkg0JLQvtC70LrQvtCy?=
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, soft...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/175323: Fail to use ZVOL as a gmirror component
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:05:21 +0400
--f46d
>Number: 175323
>Category: kern
>Synopsis: Fail to use ZVOL as a gmirror component
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-
The following reply was made to PR kern/174985; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Motin
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, ngovor...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/174985: AHCI or ATA-ATI bug on BSD 8 and above (ATI SB600;
ahci timeout; on BSD 7 - no bug)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:13:13
The following reply was made to PR kern/174985; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Motin
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, ngovor...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/174985: AHCI or ATA-ATI bug on BSD 8 and above (ATI SB600;
ahci timeout; on BSD 7 - no bug)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:14:23
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Motin
To: Allen Landsidel
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:12:14 +0200
That is clear and I had gue
26 matches
Mail list logo
