On 2012/7/29 17:16, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, David Xu wrote:
I have just written two quick-and-dirty test cases:
http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/patch/fifopipe/fifo_selectread.c
http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/patch/fifopipe/fifo_selectwrite.c
without patch for kernel cod
Old Synopsis: IXGBE_LE32_TO_CPUS is probably an unintentional no-op
New Synopsis: [ixgbe] IXGBE_LE32_TO_CPUS is probably an unintentional no-op
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jul 30 04:50:51 UTC 2012
Responsible-
>Number: 170267
>Category: kern
>Synopsis: IXGBE_LE32_TO_CPUS is probably an unintentional no-op
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class
The following reply was made to PR kern/159103; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Robert Blayzor
To: "Achilov, Rashid"
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/159103: ping local address on box shows source address 0.0.0.0
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 22:54:18 -0400
On Jul 29, 2012, at 10:51 P
Old Synopsis: Re: misc/170243: ping: useless/uninformative error message
New Synopsis: Re: bin/170243: ping(8): useless/uninformative error message
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: linimon
State-Changed-When: Mon Jul 30 03:15:56 UTC 2012
State-Changed-Why:
Misfiled followup t
The following reply was made to PR kern/159103; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Rashid N. Achilov"
To: Robert Blayzor
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/159103: ping local address on box shows source address 0.0.0.0
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:51:47 +0700
On Saturday 28 July 2012,
>Number: 170264
>Category: misc
>Synopsis: bsdinstall into jail doesn't find FTP distribution folder when
>executed on a system running a patch release kernel
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State:
The following reply was made to PR bin/170206; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, step...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: bin/170206: [msun] [patch] complex arcsinh, log, etc.
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:07:17 -0500
This is a multi-part message
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:56 PM, David Xu wrote:
...
> I have updated patch, the patch fixed lost-notification bug for select():
> http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/patch/fifopipe/kernel_pipe2.diff
This patch prevents the hang from occurring on CURRENT / r238870
(it was missing a header de
On 07/29/2012 07:08 AM, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 07/28/2012 09:31 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
OK. This clog really seems to work.
x*x + y*y - 1 is computed with a ULP less than 0.8. The rest
The following reply was made to PR kern/170254; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Lev Serebryakov
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, l...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/170254: [ath] Atheros 9220 device timeouts.
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 18:50:21 +0400
Hello, Bug-followup.
More logs, with BAR
Synopsis: [libm] [patch] Import netbsd complex functions into our libm
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: db
State-Changed-When: Sun Jul 29 13:07:48 UTC 2012
State-Changed-Why:
superseded by the efforts of freebsd-numerics
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147599
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 07/28/2012 09:31 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
OK. This clog really seems to work.
x*x + y*y - 1 is computed with a ULP less than 0.8. The rest of the
errors seem to be due to the implemen
>Number: 170255
>Category: kern
>Synopsis: Often panic at 22s uptime
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter
The following reply was made to PR kern/170254; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Lev Serebryakov
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, l...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/170254: [ath] Atheros 9220 device timeouts.
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 15:29:56 +0400
Hello, Bug-followup.
When I turn on assoc
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, David Xu wrote:
I have just written two quick-and-dirty test cases:
http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/patch/fifopipe/fifo_selectread.c
http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/patch/fifopipe/fifo_selectwrite.c
without patch for kernel code, a child process will print out "time
16 matches
Mail list logo
