Synopsis: [ppbus] [patch] fix two small printing errors in ppbus
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: eadler
State-Changed-When: Thu Sep 1 22:19:02 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why:
Hunk #2 of this patch no longer applies, is this still a bug and if so
can you please provide an updat
>Number: 160373
>Category: conf
>Synopsis: pccard_ether does not take settings in /etc/rc.conf.d/network
>into account
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>
Old Synopsis: Incorrect pfctl check of pf.conf
New Synopsis: [pf] Incorrect pfctl check of pf.conf
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-pf
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Sep 1 17:23:59 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://ww
>Number: 160370
>Category: misc
>Synopsis: Incorrect pfctl check of pf.conf
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Su
The following reply was made to PR misc/159654; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Kostik Belousov
To: Bruce Evans
Cc: Robert Millan , freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org,
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: misc/159654: 46 kernel headers use register_t but don't #include
Date: Thu, 1 Se
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 08:57:07PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2011, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> kib is working on AVX support on amd64 and i386. AVX needs changing
> the mcontext layout yet again, although we thought we left space
> for expansion of SSE structures. AVX ha
The following reply was made to PR misc/159654; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Bruce Evans
To: Kostik Belousov
Cc: Bruce Evans , Robert Millan ,
freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: misc/159654: 46 kernel headers use register_t but don't #include
D
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:57:33PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
is not a kernel header, but it is not a user
header either. It is an error to include this header directly. The
only supported includes of it are indirectly via in
applications and via
