>Number: 152132
>Category: bin
>Synopsis: Useless code in script.c (part 2)
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: change-req
>Number: 152131
>Category: bin
>Synopsis: Useless code in script.c (part 1)
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: change-req
Synopsis: man ipnat is out-dated
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-doc
Responsible-Changed-By: gjb
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Nov 10 18:21:19 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Doc PR.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152103
_
>Number: 152113
>Category: kern
>Synopsis: page fault on 8.1-RELEASE caused by certain amount of traffic
>through router
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>D
Old Synopsis: found an exploit on freebsd, "known to work" , in an infected
(linux) machine
New Synopsis: ftp/proftpd: found an exploit on freebsd, "known to work" , in an
infected (linux) machine
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-ports-bugs
Responsible-Changed-By: brucec
Respon
Old Synopsis: flashplugin-mozilla port is broken
New Synopsis: www/flashplugin-mozilla port is broken
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-ports-bugs
Responsible-Changed-By: brucec
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Nov 10 12:05:01 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Ports PR.
http://www.
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Bruce Evans wrote:
[...unrelated]
Just noticed a minor bug in the float version: from the PR:
% diff --git a/lib/msun/src/e_jnf.c b/lib/msun/src/e_jnf.c
% index 3bbf7b7..d045bb05 100644
% --- a/lib/msun/src/e_jnf.c
% +++ b/lib/msun/src/e_jnf.c
% @@ -152,7 +152,12 @@
>Number: 152103
>Category: misc
>Synopsis: man ipnat is out-dated
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: doc-bug
>Submitter-I
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Ulrich [utf-8] Sp??rlein wrote:
FreeBSD -CURRENT:
freebsd64# cc -o testjn -lm testjn.c && ./testjn
2 4.317548e-01
3 1.98e-01
4 6.474667e-02
5 1.638924e-02
6 3.404818e-03
7 6.006884e-04
8 9.216579e-05
9 1.251727e-05
FreeBSD agree
Synopsis: [NEW PORT] www/loggerhead
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-ports-bugs
Responsible-Changed-By: brucec
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Nov 10 12:06:15 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Ports PR.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152099
___
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Ulrich [utf-8] Sp??rlein wrote:
Hello Steve, I saw your updated patch for jnf(3) on the mailing list and
was wondering what the correct values for your test case would look like?
I'm asking because on Ubuntu I get slightly different values. Especially
disturbing is, that for
>Number: 152100
>Category: misc
>Synopsis: found an exploit on freebsd, "known to work" , in an infected
>(linux) machine
>Confidential: no
>Severity: critical
>Priority: high
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Number: 152099
>Category: misc
>Synopsis: [NEW PORT] www/loggerhead
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter
13 matches
Mail list logo