>Number: 149756
>Category: misc
>Synopsis: The word "children" is missing from /usr/share/dict/words
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>C
Old Synopsis: pc-sysinstall patch to add support for install to memory disks
New Synopsis: [patch] pc-sysinstall(8) patch to add support for install to
memory disks
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->imp
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Aug 17 22:47:32 UTC 201
Synopsis: [ata] [panic] reiniting detached ata channel kills the kernel
State-Changed-From-To: patched->closed
State-Changed-By: vwe
State-Changed-When: Tue Aug 17 21:30:41 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why:
fixed for 7-STABLE with c183475
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=122045
_
Synopsis: [ata] Kerneltrap 12 with atacontrol
State-Changed-From-To: patched->closed
State-Changed-By: vwe
State-Changed-When: Tue Aug 17 21:25:21 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why:
DUP of 122045, fixed in 8-CURRENT and up
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=127250
__
The following reply was made to PR conf/149424; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Oliver Fromme
To: wal...@pelissero.de
Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/149424: fstab and labels with whitespace
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:34:14 +0200 (CEST)
Walter C. Pelisse
Walter C. Pelissero wrote:
> Oliver Fromme writes:
> > What prevents you from labelling a disk 'backup\500GB'?
>
> Besides some remorse about the uninspired name, nothing keeps you from
> that. Are you also going to boot from that volume? Because that is
> what you were arguing just befor
Synopsis: [linux] [patch] Linux emulator crashed by java, when calling
ioctl(fd,SIOCGIFINDEX,...)
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-emulation
Responsible-Changed-By: arundel
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Aug 17 19:57:01 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
h
Synopsis: [linux] linux emulator interacts oddly with cp
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-emulation
Responsible-Changed-By: arundel
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Aug 17 19:52:10 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=
>Number: 149749
>Category: bin
>Synopsis: pc-sysinstall patch to add support for install to memory disks
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required
The following reply was made to PR conf/149424; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: wal...@pelissero.de (Walter C. Pelissero)
To: Oliver Fromme
Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/149424: fstab and labels with whitespace
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:49:31 +0200
Ol
Oliver Fromme writes:
> Walter C. Pelissero wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme writes:
> > > Sure, but still everyone who uses backslashes will have to
> > > change his /etc/fstab *in advance*, or otherwise his box
> > > will not boot after the update.
> >
> > It seems to be unlikely there are
The following reply was made to PR conf/149424; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Oliver Fromme
To: wal...@pelissero.de
Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/149424: fstab and labels with whitespace
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:06:26 +0200 (CEST)
Walter C. Pelisse
Walter C. Pelissero wrote:
> Oliver Fromme writes:
> > Sure, but still everyone who uses backslashes will have to
> > change his /etc/fstab *in advance*, or otherwise his box
> > will not boot after the update.
>
> It seems to be unlikely there are systems out there relying on a
> boot-tim
The following reply was made to PR conf/149424; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: wal...@pelissero.de (Walter C. Pelissero)
To: Oliver Fromme
Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/149424: fstab and labels with whitespace
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:21:58 +0200
Ol
Oliver Fromme writes:
> Walter C. Pelissero wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme writes:
> > > The problem with this patch is that it breaks backwards-
> > > compatibility. Some people might already use backslashes
> >
> > As far as I remember, the patch I proposed allowed a double backslash
> >
The following reply was made to PR conf/149424; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Oliver Fromme
To: wal...@pelissero.de
Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/149424: fstab and labels with whitespace
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:27:31 +0200 (CEST)
Walter C. Pelisse
Walter C. Pelissero wrote:
> Oliver Fromme writes:
> > The problem with this patch is that it breaks backwards-
> > compatibility. Some people might already use backslashes
>
> As far as I remember, the patch I proposed allowed a double backslash
> ('\\') to mean a single backslash ('\').
Oliver Fromme writes:
> The problem with this patch is that it breaks backwards-
> compatibility. Some people might already use backslashes
As far as I remember, the patch I proposed allowed a double backslash
('\\') to mean a single backslash ('\').
> in /etc/fstab, for whatever reason. Thi
The following reply was made to PR kern/39329; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Oliver Fromme
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, bug-follo...@freebsd.org, s...@stack.nl,
arun...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/39329: [mount] '..' at mountpoint is subject to the
?permissions of the shadow
The following reply was made to PR conf/149424; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: wal...@pelissero.de (Walter C. Pelissero)
To: Oliver Fromme
Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/149424: fstab and labels with whitespace
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:09:23 +0200
Ol
arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
> Synopsis: [mount] '..' at mountpoint is subject to the permissions of the
> shadowed dir
That's not a bug. It's supposed to work that way, and it
works like this in all UNIX variants that I'm aware of.
In fact I think it would be a bug if the behaviour was
changed.
The following reply was made to PR conf/149424; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Oliver Fromme
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, bug-follo...@freebsd.org, wal...@pelissero.de
Cc:
Subject: Re: bin/149424: fstab and labels with whitespace
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:47:46 +0200 (CEST)
Walter C. Peli
Walter C. Pelissero wrote:
> > Number: 149424
> > Category: bin
> > Synopsis: fstab and labels with whitespace
> [...]
> > Description:
> /etc/fstab currently doesn't allow for whitespace anywhere but
> between fields (or in comments). This makes impossi
>Number: 149729
>Category: misc
>Synopsis: [patch] nanoBSD: support for NANO_DRIVE including a slash
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
24 matches
Mail list logo
