https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208001
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org |
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208001
Jamie Gritton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ja...@freebsd.org
Stat
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208001
--- Comment #5 from Jamie Gritton ---
Yes, of course there are cases where something besides a /32 is appropriate -
that is why jail(8) allows that. However, as I mentioned it did appear that
you had violated the specification that an alia
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208001
Vladislav V. Prodan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Closed |Open
Resolution|Work
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208001
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-j...@freebsd.org
--
You ar
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208001
Bug ID: 208001
Summary: After turning off the jail does not remove network
routes
Product: Base System
Version: 10.3-BETA2
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208001
--- Comment #2 from Vladislav V. Prodan ---
# arp -d 10.0.0.22
10.0.0.22 (10.0.0.22) deleted
# arp -na | grep 10\\.0\\.0\\.22
? (10.0.0.22) at 00:e0:4d:a0:f8:46 on re0 permanent [ethernet]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208001
--- Comment #1 from Vladislav V. Prodan ---
# ifconfig re0 | grep 10\\.0
inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255
inet 10.0.0.19 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255
--
You are receiving this mail because:
