User Freebsd wrote:
Who *big* recognizes FreeBSD as a viable
operating system, at least openly?
When PHK asked the FreeBSD community to donate USD16,500-33000 so he
could spend 3-6 months working regular hours on FreeBSD, Pair Networks
(pair.com) donated USD20,000.
I don't know if that's "r
kevlar Hodge-Podge wrote:
I just want to see if I understand the issue correctly.
From what it sounds like there would need to both be a server for all the
individual machines to connect to, and some sort of scripted client to
capture info on the machine and send it to the server. When asking
Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote:
Why not make it part of the installer?
Present a screen at the end of the installation that briefly
explains the idea, and then let the user chose to view the
information about to be sent, refuse to send it or simply accept to
send it. This of course requires the m
My comments are inline to make it a bit easier to see which point I'm
addressing.
Jeppe W. Larsen wrote:
>
> -If you want to be seen and get status, you have to show what you are
> good at
I think a better way of putting it would be, "you have to make valuable
contributions to the project."
> -
From: Chris
> While it's true anyone can flame anybody - we in the channel do have
> some easy things to follow before asking. In the topic it refers to
> seeking the Handbook, /usr/ports/updating & /usr/src/updating.
>
> Many users after reading such topics generally find that it's not much
> to
From: M. Goodell
>
> Would you perhaps like to point out for me a flavor of Linux
> that is free of *little problems*? I'd love to see it and use
> it. I don't think you or anyone else can do that. The fact is
> that trading one OS for another is trading one set of *little
> problems* for anot
Timothy Watt wrote:
Not sure if this is the correct mailing list to post this
announcement, hopefully it is, or someone can point me to the correct
one! I recently created a blog where I will be describing my
experiences with FreeBSD and hope that it will prove useful to other
FreeBSD users, or
Vanja wrote:
I'm using 1.5.0.3 on 6.1-release, and everything seems to be fine at
www.freebsd.org... Could You be more specific about "displays faulty"?
I don't know about the OP, but for me, running Firefox 1.5.0.3 and
Internet Explorer 6.0, there are multiple elements which don't size
corre
james r relyea wrote:
i would appreciate a new freebsd loading scheme more than a replacement
loader. the main annoyance to me is the requirement that freebsd be
loaded in a primary partition. i am not familiar with the structure of
the freebsd partition or what necessitates use of a primary pa
Larry Rosenman wrote:
I always take "Linux" as a proxy for "Open-Source OS" in these type
of polls.
Linux: The xerox of the open-source OS community.
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advoc
Jessica Mahoney wrote:
Quick recap:
Windows Vista: 2 minute boot, 90 minutes of battery
What tuning did you do on Vista prior to your measurements? A
stock Vista install never actually goes idle, so it eats the
battery life.
With FreeBSD if you run X with an alpha-blending WM and a
backgr
On 10/3/2013 8:14 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
Here is an overview of the people that visit FreeBSD.org:
http://people.freebsd.org/~eadler/files/Report-10.01.pdf
Some takeaways:
- More than half (60%) the people that come to our website leave
without going to another page (called 'bouncing'). Howeve
12 matches
Mail list logo
