On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:56:51 -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
> Update:
>
> I confirmed that the scheduled publication date for my article will be
> Tuesday the 29th.
It's up at http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=2888
pgpQ4MKFzCBPF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue 29 Dec 2009 at 06:38:23 PST Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:56:51 -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
Update:
I confirmed that the scheduled publication date for my article will be
Tuesday the 29th.
It's up at http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=2888
Well done, Chad
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:39:01PM -0800, Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Tue 29 Dec 2009 at 06:38:23 PST Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:56:51 -0700, Chad Perrin
> >wrote:
> >>Update:
> >>
> >>I confirmed that the scheduled publication date for my article will be
> >>Tuesday the 29
On Tue 29 Dec 2009 at 14:51:23 PST Chad Perrin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:39:01PM -0800, Charlie Kester wrote:
One question, however. Are we prepared to back up the claim that the
"sexy" bits of PC-BSD are the least secure? Your argument depends on
that claim, since it's also implied i
