On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 00:45 +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> On 2006.10.26 23:33:58 +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > Thanks very much Peer, and apologies for both the run-around and for
> > consistently spelling your name wrong.
> >
> > Deb, thanks for checking this out.
> >
> > www@, I need a decis
On 2006.10.27 10:16:01 +0200, Joel Dahl wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 00:45 +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> > On 2006.10.26 23:33:58 +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > > Thanks very much Peer, and apologies for both the run-around and for
> > > consistently spelling your name wrong.
> > >
> > > Deb,
Thank you very much for your enthusiasm about the artwork! I am very pleased
and happy with that!
But please consider that the drafts that I posted here are still "drafts". Deb
is still after some legal issues (trademarks!), and we have to wait since all
these issues are settled.
Best regards,
P
On 27 Oct 2006, at 01:35, FreeBSD Sucks wrote:
I don’t want to run Windows, I don’t want to run Linux, I just
wanted a freakin BSD box again. So yeah, I was really
Have you tried NetBSD? Just a thought...
---
Liam J. Foy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 2006-10-26 06:25, kevlar Hodge-Podge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This post actually did get me thinking about a longtime frustration
> with one aspect of the whole Linux vs. UNIX thing. First let me say
> that I'm a real novice user so I hope this isn't something that has
> been talked to deat
If you had the choice between binary blobs with well documented use,
or fully binary drivers, which would you choose? I'm talking about a
case, such as most notably with ATI or nVidia where there is 3rd party
technology not belonging to (but liscenced by) the company, that has
to be considered, an
bd> Please remove the bits about binary blobs.. Those are a
bd> Bad Thing(tm).
js> If you had the choice between binary blobs with well
js> documented use, or fully binary drivers, which would you
js> choose? I'm talking about a case, such as most notably
- For the user, binary kernel blobs are
