On various lists, there is talk about how to we make hardware vendors sit
up and take more notice of us ... alot of the negative responses seem to
be 'we are too small of a group', but, of course, nobody out there can
really give any even *reasonable* numbers of desktops and servers deployed
> Something just for FreeBSD users (well, all *BSD users should be invited,
Why not co-operate with Linux guys on this ? there's Free Net Open
Dragon, & there' a load of Linuxes too, & a lot of the admin &
design would be the same to collect stats regardless, .. & a lot
of the hard admin tool d
IMHO, it *has* to be an officially recognized project, not something
someone just throws together and hopes ppl will register ... it should be
something that ppl are encouraged to become members of, since our goal is
to show vendors that we *are* a force ... but, it *should* be
semi-anonymous
Hi folks,
I'm asking for donations to purchase SATA drives for a new server.
Details at:
http://www.freebsddiary.org/opteron-drives-fund-raising.php
--
Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work
my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php
__
User Freebsd wrote:
Who *big* recognizes FreeBSD as a viable
operating system, at least openly?
When PHK asked the FreeBSD community to donate USD16,500-33000 so he
could spend 3-6 months working regular hours on FreeBSD, Pair Networks
(pair.com) donated USD20,000.
I don't know if that's "r
I just want to see if I understand the issue correctly.
From what it sounds like there would need to both be a server for all the
individual machines to connect to, and some sort of scripted client to
capture info on the machine and send it to the server. When asking about
older machines such
'k, there are at least two "clients" already in existence ... and, in
fact, the one that I posted the URL about even has Protocol information
included, so we *should* be able to avoid recreating the wheel here, only
extend it ...
I should *not* be a mandatory ... then we're as bad as other c
kevlar Hodge-Podge wrote:
I just want to see if I understand the issue correctly.
From what it sounds like there would need to both be a server for all the
individual machines to connect to, and some sort of scripted client to
capture info on the machine and send it to the server. When asking
