Randi Harper wrote:
> On 10/3/06, Daniel Gerzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> also layeredtech.com is pretty good.
>
> Props to layeredtech.
In the 20 months for which layeredtech has been providing free hosting for
FreeBSD Update, one of the two Portsnap mirrors, and my personal website,
I haven'
Daniel Gerzo wrote:
> Hello Nik,
>
> Tuesday, October 3, 2006, 4:31:11 PM, you wrote:
>
>> Alexandre Vieira wrote:
>>> I was also told that http://www.serverpronto.com/ is freebsd friendly and
>>> extremely cheap.
>
>> Since this seems to have become a recommendation thread, I'm a happy
>> cust
I manage a rather large instalation for a site that, so far, is all FreeBSD
based. Becouse of certain laking features however I have been looking at
various Linux versions. I have to say that to anyone who dis's the
FreeBSD install script, run off and install Gentoo. As for the other distro
's,
On 03-Oct-06 My Homeland Security "observers" reported that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
>
>> Easy yes. Nice, and good? Define Nice, or Good. On RH in particular,
>> you're stuck with either not getting fixes you want or need, or getting
>> potentially unstable ones.
>
> Okay, maybe I went to far
Easy yes. Nice, and good? Define Nice, or Good. On RH in particular,
you're stuck with either not getting fixes you want or need, or getting
potentially unstable ones.
Okay, maybe I went to far with nice.
But these are the things that make it in the enterprise.
FreeBSD, and Linux both ha
Alexandre Vieira wrote:
I was also told that http://www.serverpronto.com/ is freebsd friendly and
extremely cheap.
Since this seems to have become a recommendation thread, I'm a happy
customer of http://www.johncompanies.com/. They offer discounts to open
source contributor's too.
N
__
On 10/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> EV1Servers has never been a major supporter of FreeBSD -- back when
>> they were RackShack, it took a petition of several hundred people
>> before they started offering FreeBSD at all.
>> I wonder if they'll start offering more recent
On 10/3/06, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scott I. Remick wrote:
> Eduardo Meyer wrote:
>>
>> I have been pointed in private mail to http://www.fdcservers.net/
>> which seems to treat FreeBSD more seriously too, in case anyone else
>> is/get disapointed by EV1's lack of pro
Scott I. Remick wrote:
> Eduardo Meyer wrote:
>>
>> I have been pointed in private mail to http://www.fdcservers.net/
>> which seems to treat FreeBSD more seriously too, in case anyone else
>> is/get disapointed by EV1's lack of professionalism regarding FreeBSD.
>
> FDC seems to have a pretty swe
>The real issue is, the Linux distros like redhat have a nice, good,
easy,
>way to kick the machine on auto as far as major security patches.
Something like freebsd-update
(http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-update/)
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org ma
EV1Servers has never been a major supporter of FreeBSD -- back when
they were RackShack, it took a petition of several hundred people
before they started offering FreeBSD at all.
I wonder if they'll start offering more recent FreeBSD releases next
month after FreeBSD 5.4 becomes unsupported...
Eduardo Meyer wrote:
I have been pointed in private mail to http://www.fdcservers.net/
which seems to treat FreeBSD more seriously too, in case anyone else
is/get disapointed by EV1's lack of professionalism regarding FreeBSD.
FDC seems to have a pretty sweet price for a VPS (starting at $19/m
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:21:33PM -0300, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> "if your server is re-imaged with 6.0 vs the 5.4 version currently
> installed we will not be able to support this. We have found that the
> versions after 5.4 are inherantly unstable. Please let us know what
> course of action you wo
ED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: EV1 Servers makes me sick
>
> Colin Percival wrote:
> > Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> >> "if your server is re-imaged with 6.0 vs the 5.4 version currently
> >> installed we will not be able to support this. We have
> found tha
EV1Servers has never been a major supporter of FreeBSD -- back when
they were RackShack, it took a petition of several hundred people
before they started offering FreeBSD at all.
I wonder if they'll start offering more recent FreeBSD releases next
month after FreeBSD 5.4 becomes unsupported...
Colin Percival wrote:
> Eduardo Meyer wrote:
>> "if your server is re-imaged with 6.0 vs the 5.4 version currently
>> installed we will not be able to support this. We have found that the
>> versions after 5.4 are inherantly unstable. Please let us know what
>> course of action you would like to ta
Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> "if your server is re-imaged with 6.0 vs the 5.4 version currently
> installed we will not be able to support this. We have found that the
> versions after 5.4 are inherantly unstable. Please let us know what
> course of action you would like to take."
EV1Servers has never b
17 matches
Mail list logo
