My question was a direct response to another comment, which said the new
CoC did not chase away any significant contributors.
Do we want to attract people with no useful skills? I think that,
regardless of whether you are "Vulnerable" or "Oppressor", your work
should have to be good enough to be i
Was the project going to lose any significant contributors if we didn't
protect them from *hugs*?
PostgreSQL recently adopted a reasonable, non-politicized CoC. If
someone is harassed (and it has to be real harassment not just some
vague "reinforcing systemic oppression" which I think might includ
On 2018-03-05 15:51, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 02:48:26PM -0500, Stephen Cook wrote:
>> The problem with the Foundation sponsoring a CoC is that a small group
>> of extremists forced their way in to generate and implement their own
>> set of rules, s
On 2018-03-05 12:51, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 3/4/2018 5:13 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>> d...@freebsdfoundation.org wrote:
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> This is Deb Goodkin, Executive Director for the FreeBSD Foundation. The
>>> Foundation isn't responsible for the CoC, that would be the FreeBSD
>>> Pro
On 2018-03-04 20:13, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> d...@freebsdfoundation.org wrote:
>> Someone else on this thread can hopefully
>> direct you to the correct mailing list for discussing your concerns
>> regarding the Code of Conduct.
Where?
> Did the foundation pay for it ?
I would like to know a
On 2017-02-03 15:51, Alex Libman wrote:
> WHAT *SHOULD* THE B IN BSD STAND FOR?
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-advocacy&m=129750891811408&w=2
I vote for Batman Software Distribution!
-- Stephen
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
https://
