Re: EV1 Servers makes me sick

2006-10-03 Thread Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg
Scott I. Remick wrote: > Eduardo Meyer wrote: >> >> I have been pointed in private mail to http://www.fdcservers.net/ >> which seems to treat FreeBSD more seriously too, in case anyone else >> is/get disapointed by EV1's lack of professionalism regarding FreeBSD. > > FDC seems to have a pretty swe

Re: FreeBSD not popular in Asia?

2006-09-14 Thread Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg
Olivier Nicole wrote: >> Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push >> the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting >> from there ... DragonFly is first, then NetBSD and then OpenBSD ... > > 6 days later: Thailand jumped from 12 machines t

Re: What sort of market does FreeBSD provide ... ?

2006-07-24 Thread Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg
User Freebsd wrote: > > 'k, there are at least two "clients" already in existence ... and, in > fact, the one that I posted the URL about even has Protocol information > included, so we *should* be able to avoid recreating the wheel here, > only extend it ... > > I should *not* be a mandatory ...

Re: Fwd: Macromedia Customer Service Request [8542731]

2006-04-25 Thread Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg
Chad Gross wrote: > Hello all, > > This is the letter that Macromedia support sent back to me. We now > have documentation which allows us to put the Flash plugin back in > ports. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Service <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Apr 24, 2006 5:55 PM > Subjec

Re: New Logo

2005-11-01 Thread Roger &#x27;Rocky' Vetterberg
stheg olloydson wrote: it was said by stanb: YUK! -- U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong Terror - New York Times 9/3/1967 Look on the bright side! Everyone expected this to turn out badly, and they got more than they expected. Way more. shu

Re: FreeBSD's Visual Identity: Outdated?

2005-07-02 Thread Roger &#x27;Rocky' Vetterberg
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 4:57 PM To: Simon Burke Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; freebs

Re: FreeBSD's Visual Identity: Outdated?

2005-07-02 Thread Roger &#x27;Rocky' Vetterberg
Simon Burke wrote: [snip] 2. If it wasn't for the interesting content and structure of the FreeBSD website, it would be among the less beautiful. Yes, it serves its purpose well by being simple and straight to the point. But a redesign could offer just the same -- simplicity and accuracy --

Re: Use send-pr. Use chat@.

2005-06-23 Thread Roger &#x27;Rocky' Vetterberg
Julian H. Stacey wrote: I feel the handbook could be made clearer in some areas, but I believe it is good in general. ( This Not directed at sender above, so sender's name omitted, but the above is a mild example of much worse noise from other hollow vessels on this list. If it doesn't hel

Re: Explaining FreeBSD features

2005-06-22 Thread Roger &#x27;Rocky' Vetterberg
Andrew L. Gould wrote: On Monday 20 June 2005 07:37 pm, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote: Fafa Hafiz Krantz wrote: *snip* FreeBSD is a typical system driven by technical people. Clearly its weakest point. Once again, that depends on your audience. If you ask me, its one of

Re: Explaining FreeBSD features

2005-06-20 Thread Roger &#x27;Rocky' Vetterberg
Fafa Hafiz Krantz wrote: *snip* FreeBSD is a typical system driven by technical people. Clearly its weakest point. Once again, that depends on your audience. If you ask me, its one of FreeBSD's strongest points. Im one of those "technical people", and the main reason I like BSD is that its

Re: Romanian BitDefender for FreeBSD Mail Servers line

2005-05-31 Thread Roger &#x27;Rocky' Vetterberg
Sander Vesik wrote: On 5/31/05, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Since this discussion arises almost on a monthly basis on advocacy@, I think we can safely say that a will to change the current website clearly exists. Likewise, a will *not* to change the web

Re: Romanian BitDefender for FreeBSD Mail Servers line

2005-05-31 Thread Roger &#x27;Rocky' Vetterberg
Sander Vesik wrote: On 5/29/05, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And, if I understood it correctly, he was not requesting an immediate change to the webpage. He stepped up and announced a *will* to change it, and was asking for feedback and thoughts. When t

Re: [30-05-05] Layout update

2005-05-30 Thread Roger &#x27;Rocky' Vetterberg
Erich Dollansky wrote: Hi, John Jawed wrote: I've tried to amend to the best of my ability the resizing issues mentioned earlier. I think, if you do not know much about CSS layouts, that you should expect some type of distortion at some unrealistically small resolutions (less than 800x600).

Re: Romanian BitDefender for FreeBSD Mail Servers line

2005-05-28 Thread Roger &#x27;Rocky' Vetterberg
Julian H. Stacey wrote: All, inc Daniel, advocacy@ list is not a web designers chat room. Regular hot air here from various people about web page design is Tedious. - advocacy@ is the Wrong Address to change content of www.freebsd.org - Use send-pr to submit web page corrections (for a commit

Re: Main site makeover

2005-05-27 Thread Roger &#x27;Rocky' Vetterberg
John Jawed wrote: Right now, I have the design stored away into a PSD (I still use Windows for design work), I suppose I could just auto slice it right away...but that would not be the code I want to hand over and hence may not be what I wanted to protray (mainly because Photoshop slices in tab

Re: is this your culture?

2005-05-11 Thread Roger &#x27;Rocky' Vetterberg
Jeppe Larsen wrote: Hi again [snip] -Our way of doing things is right (well, this is very commonsense, because of course you think that FreeBS at least has some things right, or else you wouldn't be working on the project vulentarily. But it should also say something about your little "distance" yo

Re: is this your culture?

2005-05-10 Thread Roger &#x27;Rocky' Vetterberg
Jeppe W. Larsen wrote: Hi there *snip* -If you want to be seen and get status, you have to show what you are good at Change that to 'you have to contribute to the project' -We are the helpfull faceless people -In the end, it is the code that matters most Not just code, the quality of the code also