On Tue 29 Dec 2009 at 14:51:23 PST Chad Perrin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:39:01PM -0800, Charlie Kester wrote:
One question, however. Are we prepared to back up the claim that the
"sexy" bits of PC-BSD are the least secure? Your argument depends on
that claim, since it'
On Tue 29 Dec 2009 at 06:38:23 PST Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:56:51 -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
Update:
I confirmed that the scheduled publication date for my article will be
Tuesday the 29th.
It's up at http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=2888
Well done, Chad
On Tue 15 Dec 2009 at 07:33:49 PST Jan Husar wrote:
http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/opensource/?p=1123&tag=nl.e011
Others have pointed out that PC-BSD meets the need expressed in this
article.
As for FreeBSD itself, the question must be asked: do we WANT to get
more love from people who judg
On Sun 27 Sep 2009 at 12:25:50 PDT Chris Rees wrote:
This guy replying to your post was a troll, basically. Ignore him, and
Yep. It shows that some Linux fans are just as prone to creating FUD as
their adversaries in the Windows world.
I'd like to think the BSD community is better than that.
