Hi Vasily,
it works much better now, thank you! I am not getting as many matches as
I would like, but at least the feedback is given immediately.
Best regards,
Julian
W dniu 10.02.2016 o 08:06, Vasily Khoruzhick pisze:
> Hi Julian,
>
> Could you please try feb2016-wip branch of
> https://github
Hm, so fixed version has a worse match rate? Could you please play
with FINGER_REMOVED_THRESHOLD and DIFF_THRESHOLD values in
libfprint/drivers/upeksonly.c?
Try 200-400 for FINGER_REMOVED_THRESHOLD and 5-10 for DIFF_THRESHOLD
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> Hi Vasily,
>
Hi Vasily,
it is a bit hard to say as prior to the latest fixes the reader was not
that usable. Having said that, my subjective feeling is that it is
really hard to get a match now. Case in point: I tried this morning a
bunch of times and got 14 mismatches, 1 match and 10 scan retry requests
in be
Did you re-enroll your finger(s) with a fixed version?
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> Hi Vasily,
>
> it is a bit hard to say as prior to the latest fixes the reader was not
> that usable. Having said that, my subjective feeling is that it is
> really hard to get a matc
I did, just to be sure. The enrollment seems to work fine.
Julian
W dniu 11.02.2016 o 08:52, Vasily Khoruzhick pisze:
> Did you re-enroll your finger(s) with a fixed version?
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>> Hi Vasily,
>>
>> it is a bit hard to say as prior to the
