Re: [fprint] Working with small sensors

> Is this a small sensor problem and is there really too little minutiae? See https://cedar.buffalo.edu/~srihari/papers/RRP-full.pdf page 7 fig 3 e,f where it says 20 and 15 minutiae. A 114x57 scan is roughly 1/3 of that area. In my experience there's usually <5 minutiae on a 144x64 image. That's

Re: [fprint] Working with small sensors

On Fri, 2020-06-12 at 22:08 +0700, Indev wrote: > What is the state of small sensors matching? Are there any working > drivers for small sensors? I think the equivalent case here is the elan driver. It continues to grab more image frames assuming that the user is swiping the finger over the sensor

Re: [fprint] Working with small sensors

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 8:05 AM Indev wrote: > > I've heard that fprint matching doesn't work well with small sensors. > > In my case (issue #162), the device returns 114x57 images and there is > probably not much minutiae to extract. I am certain that it is a press > sensor, even though it retu

[fprint] Working with small sensors

I've heard that fprint matching doesn't work well with small sensors. In my case (issue #162 ), the device returns 114x57 images and there is probably not much minutiae to extract. I am certain that it is a press sensor, even though