Re: [fprint] elan patch + poc 0x903 and 0x0C03

2018-01-30 Thread Igor Filatov
Hi Timo, Sure, give it a shot! And as I said earlier, remember that you don't need a generic algo for any 2 fingerprints. The prints always come from the same device. On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:16 PM TeEmZe wrote: > Hi, > > > > > > I'll give it a shot in C, but will switch to Java before despera

Re: [fprint] elan patch + poc 0x903 and 0x0C03

2018-01-30 Thread TeEmZe
Hi, I'll give it a shot in C, but will switch to Java before desperation. I'll try to implement the Fingerprint Identification Using Cross Correlation of Field Orientation – there are a few papers online. I’ll write a library which receives two images (the enrolled and the one to verify)

Re: [fprint] elan patch + poc 0x903 and 0x0C03

2018-01-30 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 29-01-18 21:52, TeEmZe wrote: Hi, Let’s assume I’d like to take a look at it (I am indeed quite interested). Would I have to write the algorithm in C (I am, as mentioned, not quite good in C and I don’t think that C is the perfect language for algorithmic)? And would I have to rewrite t

Re: [fprint] elan patch + poc 0x903 and 0x0C03

2018-01-30 Thread Igor Filatov
>From what I understand, you need to compare big images to big images for the minutiae algo to work good. If the verification images are small, they simply won't have enough minutiae. I think Hans had a good point when he mentioned that the existing stitching code could be used. libfprint has the