Hi, I was looking to try FPC but I saw the latest release isn't available for
Solaris, only 2.4something. Do you guys plan on releasing the new version on
Solaris? Do you intend to keep supporting Solaris?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.
Sorry if this is a duplicate. I sent it from my phone yesterday but it has
not shown up yet, possibly due to the html issue.
I was looking to try FPC and I downloaded the Linux version. I saw the
latest release isn't available for Solaris.
Do you guys plan on releasing the 2.6.0 version on Solari
On Wed, 9 May 2012 17:19:59 +0200
"Ludo Brands" wrote:
> >
> > Hi, I was looking to try FPC but I saw the latest release
> > isn't available for Solaris, only 2.4something. Do you guys
> > plan on releasing the new version on Solaris? Do you intend
> > to keep supporting Solaris?
> >
> 2.6.0
On Wed, 9 May 2012 17:19:59 +0200
"Ludo Brands" wrote:
> >
> > Hi, I was looking to try FPC but I saw the latest release
> > isn't available for Solaris, only 2.4something. Do you guys
> > plan on releasing the new version on Solaris? Do you intend
> > to keep supporting Solaris?
> >
> 2.6.0
From: "Tomas Hajny"
>> Do you guys plan on releasing the 2.6.0 version on Solaris and is there
>> a timeframe? Do you plan on continuing to support Solaris? I would be
>> interested in running both the Intel and SPARC versions if they come
>> available.
> I'm not the right one to answer this que
On Wed, 09 May 2012 16:10:06 + Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> > There is a directory for Solaris SPARC but it is empty. Is it possible
> > to get 2.6.0 for Solaris SPARC? Thanks again.
> I've got a copy that I've built and run here, but I started off with an
> earlier version and had to jump thro
On Wed, 9 May 2012 18:44:08 +0200 Jonas Maebe wrote:
> There is no real Solaris maintainer. Pierre sometimes works on it and I
> run nightly Solaris/SPARC regression tests (for as long as I still have
> access to a Solaris/SPARC machine), but I definitely do not support the
> platform. Solaris/SPA
On Wed, 9 May 2012 19:02:16 +0200 (CEST) "Tomas Hajny" wrote:
> My point was that there has been no official / dedicated maintainer for
> that platform within the core team recently which is the reason why there
> are no official builds for Solaris for version 2.6.0. Mark Morgan Lloyd
> who alread
On Wed, 09 May 2012 18:37:12 + Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> microcode wrote:
> > I am not sure I understood your message. 2.6.0 SPARC isn't available
> > for download, but you suggest it as an interim release because of fixes
> > in an upcoming release that probably
On Wed, 9 May 2012 21:05:56 +0200 "Ludo Brands" wrote:
> In any case, 2.6.0 is needed now to build 2.7.1. Just rebuild 2.7.1 from
> today on Solaris 10 Intel and it failed miserably with 2.4.4. That worked
> a few months ago and the 2.7.1 then build doesn't build todays 2.7.1
> neither. Only 2.6.0
On Wed, 09 May 2012 19:45:11 + Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> One thing I would stress for the OP's benefit: SPARC 2.6.0 was entirely
> able to build itself and Lazarus. It's only when I tried mixing database
> access and some heavy floating-point astronomical calculations that the
> problems beca
On Wed, 09 May 2012 18:18:59 + Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> My main role is being a thorn in the side of the core developers when
> something stops working :-) However I've previously offered to host a
> (not very fast) system here for compilation etc., and the offer stands.
What SPARC box(es)
I screwed up the quoting here, sorry. Jeff didn't write all below, I think
some of it was Mark.
On Wed, 09 May 2012 18:01:43 -0400 Jeff Wormsley wrote:
> And what, pray, is wrong with Slackware? :-)
Nothing :-) Once you Slack you never go back!
> Most of the SPARC systems around here are Debian
Thu, 10 May 2012 08:45:14 +0200 Sven Barth wrote
> The text mode IDE "fp" is not used that much on Unix based systems thus
> such problems regarding to recent/old libraries are not detected that
> easily.
That would explain it! But I saw fp once and I loved it, very Borland Turbo!
> Most users u
On Thu, 10 May 2012 07:27:22 + Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> microcode wrote:
> > What SPARC box(es) do you have? I may be able to host Solaris
> > development systems if needed although the SPARC stuff would have to be
> > scheduled since I cannot leave them on all the tim
On Thu, 10 May 2012 07:32:47 + Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> > How many sockets do you have on your E4500?
>
> 12, i.e. space for an I/O card and internal discs for booting.
Woohoo! That's a lot of CPUs. I'll bet you can heat your home with that in
the winter.
> I prefer the SS1000 architecture
On Thu, 10 May 2012 14:07:47 +0200 (CEST) "Tomas Hajny" wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 13:22, microcode wrote:
> > Sun makes awfully nice boxes and Solaris is a very nice development
> > platform. I hope the guys will keep FPC going on Solaris. There are
> > many S
On Thu, 10 May 2012 17:14:45 + Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> You might find the fpc-devel mailing list interesting, although I think
> that everybody would admit that there is a shortage of documentation for
> the entrails of the compiler.
Thanks, I'm subscribed but haven't seen any messages ye
On Fri, 11 May 2012 13:59:42 +0200 Sven Barth wrote:
> Am 11.05.2012 11:29, schrieb microcode
>> On Thu, 10 May 2012 17:14:45 + Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>>
>>> You might find the fpc-devel mailing list interesting, although I think
>>> that everybody would
It seems I have to post twice or nothing shows up to the list!
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:29:28 +0200 Sven Barth
wrote:
> This might be, because you compiled it without a libgdb which in turn is
> the one who links dynamically to libc. Most FPC applications (if they
> don't use threads or a WideString manager) don't require libc and thus
> don't need to link to
Thanks Mark. I haven't gotten to my SPARC boxes yet. Since I already had a copy
of 2.6.0 built on my Linux box I was playing around with building there first.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Morgan Lloyd
Sender: fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 09:05:55
To:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:20:34AM +0200, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> On 15-8-2012 10:08, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
> > Am Wednesday 15 August 2012 09:59:00 schrieb Lukasz Sokol:
> >> On 15/08/2012 08:33, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
> >>> Am Wednesday 15 August 2012 03:52:00 schrieb waldo kitty:
> t
Is anybody else receiving mailformed emails from the list?
I've received several, most or all from Marco, with all with most of the
headers appearing as text since there is an extra blank line between the
X-Mailer header and the previous ones.
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:29:15 +0200 (CEST)
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 01:15:09PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> microc...@zoho.com wrote:
> >Is anybody else receiving mailformed emails from the list?
> >
> >I've received several, most or all from Marco, with all with most of the
> >headers appearing as text since there is an extra blank lin
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:20:15PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> microc...@zoho.com wrote:
>
> >>I note that the headers you quote include a few X- headers that I
> >>don't see here:
> >>
> >>>X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
> >>>X-BeenThere: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> >>>X-Mailm
"Starting at $1795"
Intel/AMD only.
Nope!
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 06:20:29PM +0100, Reinier Olislagers wrote: > Has anybody tried the Pathscale debugger on Linux x64/FreeBSD? > > I haven't myself, just heard that they open sourced their compiler suite. > > A download page seems to be here: > http
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 07:57:09PM +0100, Jonas Maebe wrote: > > On 10 Nov 2012, at 19:38, microc...@zoho.com wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 06:20:29PM +0100, Reinier Olislagers wrote: > >> Has anybody tried the Pathscale debugger on Linux x64/FreeBSD? > >> > >> I haven't myself, just hear
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:23:42AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Patrick wrote:
>
> >I fell in love with Ada about 14 months ago. Including the
> >cardboard box, i now have 53lbs of Ada books(A few still to read),
> >I am planning on diving into Pascal in this way too and I want to
> >mix Ada
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:04:53PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> microc...@zoho.com wrote:
>
> >Ada support off Linux and Windows gets very expensive. But the market is far
> >from dead. New standards have been approved even recently.
>
> Unfortunately, that's also true of COBOL and even of s
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 09:23:29AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Sven Barth wrote:
>
> >>An llvm target will move the optimisation burden away from fpc, which
> >>would be very interesting.
> >
> >While we would welcome a LLVM backend it is basically a consent in
> >the development team that t
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:09:07PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Dennis wrote:
> >I wrote a free pascal program in ubuntu Linux and wanted to deploy
> >it to run in a netgear router through open router firmware
> >OpenWrt.
> >To test it, I copied the program into a OpenWrt virtualbox virtual
>
32 matches
Mail list logo
