I'm modifying the lazarus packaging scripts to make building debs of
lazarus, fpc and cross-fpc variants simpler than it is. (Cross is not
simple right now)
I've read the buildfaq (thanks Marco) and various fpc build scripts but
am still puzzled in this respect:
Why does:
$ cd fpc
$make cle
* Marco van de Voort wrote, On 07/12/07 08:20:
>> I'm modifying the lazarus packaging scripts to make building debs of
>> lazarus, fpc and cross-fpc variants simpler than it is. (Cross is not
>> simple right now)
>>
>> I've read the buildfaq (thanks Marco) and various fpc build scripts but
>> am
Sam Liddicott wrote:
> Sam Liddicott wrote:
>> * Marco van de Voort wrote, On 07/12/07 08:20:
>>>> I'm modifying the lazarus packaging scripts to make building debs of
>>>> lazarus, fpc and cross-fpc variants simpler than it is. (Cross is not
>>
Sam Liddicott wrote:
> * Marco van de Voort wrote, On 07/12/07 08:20:
>>> I'm modifying the lazarus packaging scripts to make building debs of
>>> lazarus, fpc and cross-fpc variants simpler than it is. (Cross is not
>>> simple right now)
>>>
>>&
Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 08 Dec 2007, at 19:26, Sam Liddicott wrote:
>
>>> So... because the makefile knew it was compiling for the same
>>> architecture it decided that I wasn't building an fpc cross compiler
>>> but cross building an fpc compiler?
Find the definition of the "text" type and see that it contains pointers to
read and write functions.
They need replacing in yor instance to pointers to functions that do nothing.
The original Pascal file access is object oriented after all!
Sam
-Original Message-
From: Tomas Hajny <[