Re: [fpc-pascal] Polymorphism question

2006-03-03 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
__ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal Try override instead of overload -- Rodrigo Palhano - Equipe SpeedCASE ___ fpc-pascal m

Re: [fpc-pascal] Object pascal a "Modern Language"

2006-03-03 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
er FPC to be a modern language, FYI ;-). Micha ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal -- Rodrigo Palhano - Equipe SpeedCASE

Re: [fpc-pascal] Object pascal a "Modern Language"

2006-03-03 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
with a shared LCL library ? Micha ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal -- Rodrigo Palhano - Equipe SpeedCASE ___

[fpc-pascal] TClientDataset for freepascal

2006-03-08 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
Is there any equivalent component available in FreePascal? CachedUpdates, ApplyUpdates and so on... tks for att. -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org htt

[fpc-pascal] Interfaces in FPC

2006-03-09 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
Are interfaces in FPC reference counted like in Delphi ? -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Interfaces in FPC

2006-03-09 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
Why is that ? Is there anyway i could deactivate this ref count feature? On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:53:34 -0300, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9 mrt 2006, at 19:34, Rodrigo Palhano wrote: Are interfaces in FPC reference counted like in Delphi ? Yes.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Interfaces in FPC

2006-03-09 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
That's really cool, i am starting to love fpc... :) On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 16:37:18 -0300, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Jonas Maebe wrote: On 9 mrt 2006, at 19:58, Rodrigo Palhano wrote: > On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:53:34 -0300, Jonas M

[fpc-pascal] N-Tier in FPC

2006-03-09 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
Is there any way (components, classes) i can develop 3-tier (n-tier...) application in FPC ?? tks -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepas

Re: [fpc-pascal] N-Tier in FPC

2006-03-09 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
Is there any chance we have a TDatasetProvider like implementation in FPC ? On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 17:16:40 -0300, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Rodrigo Palhano wrote: Is there any way (components, classes) i can develop 3-tier (n-tier...) appli

Re: [fpc-pascal] N-Tier in FPC

2006-03-09 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
Maybe someday we'll have TDatasetProviver + TClientDataset :) Thanks for your quick answers Michael! -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.free

Re: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
ailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal -- Rodrigo Palhano - Equipe SpeedCASE ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-16 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
Nice post, - the framework is huge. This is more important than it seems. Less components to buy, more people using a standarised set of components. It has its attraction. On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:24:51 -0300, Marco van de Voort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Tottaly agree, this has been microsoft

Re: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-16 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
Agreed. But talking about being realistic, buying delphi and supporting it seems quite an unrealistic attempt too. On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:40:03 -0300, memsom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What he meant is that supporting fpc/lazarus development is a quite more tangible task than trying to buy and

[fpc-pascal] [OFF-TOPIC] language history

2006-03-29 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
kind of interesting http://www.levenez.com/lang/history.html ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] RE: Nice website

2006-06-28 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
looks great! - Jeff ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-p

Re: [fpc-pascal] RE: Nice website

2006-06-28 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
Clean fast and tableless, i like it. On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:35:56 -0300, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Rodrigo Palhano wrote: What website are you talking about ? http://www.freepascal.org/ M

[fpc-pascal] Web development

2007-01-08 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
How can FPC help me to develop web applications ? What kind of web technologies are already available in FPC ? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] The reason why linus torvalds hate-pascal

2008-04-15 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
sts.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal -- Rodrigo Palhano - Equipe SpeedCASE http://www.speedcase.com.br ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] The reason why linus torvalds hate-pascal

2008-04-17 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
XIT as a bad programming practice, it makes life harder for code readers. -- Rodrigo Palhano - Equipe SpeedCASE http://www.speedcase.com.br ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.or

Re: [fpc-pascal] The reason why linus torvalds hate-pascal

2008-04-17 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 6:53 PM, mm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Rodrigo Palhano a écrit : > On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:39:37 -0300, Zaher Dirkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I use GO TO when teaching pascal, but after all i ask them to not use i

Re: [fpc-pascal] The reason why linus torvalds hate-pascal

2008-04-17 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
above is *so* much clearer than implementing 12 nested levels of if..then..else. Alan ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal -- Rodrigo Palhano - Equipe SpeedC