Great news! Thank you to the FPC team for all magnificent work.
I maintain Docker images with FPC (with various versions and
cross-compilers, with Castle Game Engine and some related tools), see
https://hub.docker.com/r/kambi/castle-engine-cloud-builds-tools/ and
https://github.com/castle-engine/c
That's a funny interaction between Variants and Pascal's ambiguous
(logical or bitwise) "and" :) Both the operators and the types are
ambiguous -> making the boolean short-circuit evaluation not possible.
Indeed one workaround is to cast the variants to Booleans explicitly,
which makes it use logi
The chatbot is quite amazing :) I wrote about my nicest moments on
https://castle-engine.io/wp/2022/12/17/my-mind-is-blown-i-can-use-ai-to-generate-castle-game-engine-code-to-integrate-it-with-physx-i-can-use-ai-to-generate-html-documentation-from-comments-in-pascal-code/
-- generate Pascal code to
I'm also curious :)
I just tested, and the -Co (lowercase "o") enables overflow checking
by default (like "{$Q+}" in code),
https://github.com/michaliskambi/modern-pascal-introduction/wiki/What-are-range-and-overflow-checks-(and-errors)-in-Pascal
.
But -CO (uppercase "O") seems unrelated to it.
Steve,
If you're looking for equivalent to "return X", use "Exit" with a
parameter in Pascal: "Exit(X)".
It's just a shortcut for "Result := X; Exit;"
Regards,
Michalis
pon., 12 cze 2023 o 19:57 Steve Litt via fpc-pascal
napisał(a):
>
> Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-pascal said on Mon, 12 Jun 2023 0
Note:
As a consequence, the GitHub Action
https://github.com/gcarreno/setup-lazarus also fails now. Trying to
use it to install FPC+Lazarus results in an error
Error: getPackageList -- Request timeout: /packagelist.json
in GitHub Action workflow output. I guess because the action downloads
htt
Karoly Balogh wrote:
> We're in the offtopic again, but I really hate this kind of elitism. As a
> kid I started with BASIC - on various Commodore home computers then also
> on early IBM PCs - and I hope to think I grew up to be a semi-decent
> programmer. At least I can fix your Pascal compiler fo
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > Let's delete custom very special FPC variant with ticks. leave only Delphi
> > variant, please. in English it is maybe called as 'align implementation with
> > Delphi'.
>
> It is aligned with Delphi ?
>
> > why? to keep the same source when changing objfpc/delphi mode
>
> Anyways, thanks to for getting this merged. It’s been a whopping 6 years
> since the PR was made and it’s a very welcome feature for embedded code. 👏
>
Oh, I also want to add "thank you" by the way for multi-line strings!
We have code constructing long shaders in Castle Game Engine. It right
> Your argument makes no sense. There's always been multiple ways to do
> many things in pascal, and it's never caused any more confusion than any
> other typical language construct.
I don't think the comparison to "multiple ways to write a comment" is
proper here. Because various ways to write c
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> Personally, I prefer the backtick solution.
> The triple quote is slow, it requires postprocessing the string.
> The backtick solution needs only one pass.
>
>
> I positively HATE it when people start treating whitespace as
> significant. No YAML or Python for me on th
> But pas2js exists, I believe it is important, and that explains my decision.
OK. I will have to accept this decision :) Well I see your arguments
(Pas2js compatibility + you feel Delphi design is "horror" :) ). Even
if I do see a different decision as more optimal.
For the sake of clarity, I do
12 matches
Mail list logo
