Hello,
could anybody explain me, which GTK+ distribution should I use to run
Win32 executables compiled with fpc? I use fpc versions from 1.0.6 to
1.1, and GTK-1.3 binaries that come with GIMP-1.2.4 and 1.2.5, and
no combination is satisfactory. The most common error are library
names inconsist
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: "Laurent Cocea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject:[fpc-pascal]replacing BEGIN and END?
> Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date sent: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 21:41:35 -0800 (PST)
> Hi all-
>
> Do you guys think there might be a way, either
> From: Alan Mead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject:Re: [fpc-pascal]RTF
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date sent: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
> --- David G Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > rtfpars
> > Contains a RTF
Hello,
I am using fpc 1.0.10 in both Unix and W32. Need to process
an external file with external binary program:
exec(myprog, myfile);
I cannot process this way any file that name contains whitespaces.
Replacing 'my file' with '"my file"', 'my\ file', '"my\ file"'
has no effect; apart from
Marco van de Voort wrote:
> The harsh answer:
> 1 using spaces in unix :-)
this is users' decision, not the programmer's.
Besides, it is legal ;)
> 2 using 1.0.x, while 1.9.x is so much better.
yes, 1.0.4 was much too buggy for me.
1.0.10 occured quite stable and was enough up to now.
> Serious
Hello everybody,
are there units available to achieve GTKExtra from Free Pascal?
With regards,
Jan Jelowicki
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Hello,
I have dozens of blas-like assembler procedures. They have been
written about 10 years ago and I still use them in both virtualpascal
and free pascal programs.
Today I tried new fpc 1.9.8. Output generated from fpc 1.9.8 code
seems errorenous. The isolated example given below tries to f
> From: Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject:Re: [fpc-pascal] intel asm and fpc-1.9.8
> Date sent: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 17:59:45 +0100
> To: FPC-Pascal users discussions
> Send reply to: FPC-Pascal users discussions
>
> On 9
Hello all,
I am porting some pascal code from gtk 1.2 to 2.x using fpc 1.9.8.
Is there any difference between meaning of return values
of signal callbacks in GTK+ 1.2 and 2.x?
I have troubles when I try to to GtkEntry a sevice, that would check
whether some special key values were pressed, pro
Hello all,
In GTK2, the GtkCombo widget is marked as depreciated.
However, no information is given as it might be totally defunctional.
At least in linux libraries, up to 2.6, it seems to be quite good.
I am porting some pascal software form gtk 1.2 to 2.x using fpc 1.9.8.
None of my (previousl
Hello all,
I had a problem with porting some code from gtk1.2:
installed signal callbacks were blocking signasl propagation
despite fact they returned false.
I have found a solution by myself: old handlers returned one-byte
boolean. Threr was enough for gtk1.2, while gtk2 needs lognbool.
The
Hello all,
Today I have localised a problem with GtkCombo; there is a minimal
program that could reproduce crash of GtkCombo in W32 environment.
I cannot see any bug, there are just standard instructions;
maybe I am wrong? or rather the bug is in the GTK binary for Windows?
or even in FPC bind?
Hello,
That is exactly the meritum.
I was trying to write adequate C example for comparison,
unfortunately I realized that I had no GTK+ source packages
at home. And today morning I knew the solution from your mail.
> No, this is *not* a bug somewhere in general FPC record aligning
> algorithm.
13 matches
Mail list logo