Hello,
I'm currently using Freepascal for Windows mainly, and we even
develop commercial applications with it - so in its state it is
already stable enough for commercial use. Of course I'm grateful to
all FP developers out there.
My business needs advice me to completely switch from De
Hello Jonas,
Saturday, October 23, 2004, 6:41:59 PM, you wrote:
>> The question is: will moving to Freepascal permit me to compile my
>> programs for Macintosh platform without severe hassle?
JM> I don't know. That depends on whether you have a lot of endian-specific
JM> code, whether you us
Hello Jonas,
Sunday, October 24, 2004, 12:23:22 AM, you wrote:
>> Thanks to Peter Vreman for Lazarus link. It looks like a helpful
>> thing. However I wonder about its Mac compatibility - not too much
>> Mac-related info is there it seems.
JM> It cannot yet generate programs which use the native
Hello Jonas,
Never mind, thanks!
Sunday, October 24, 2004, 11:51:02 PM, you wrote:
JM> On 24 okt 2004, at 18:25, Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
>> But will it be possible to me to draw on a standard device context
>> returned to me by a host application? I.e. I do not need any standard
Hello Olle,
Thanks for your reply, it's not bad to have a gfx-related Linux
compatibility at the same time.
Monday, October 25, 2004, 11:14:53 PM, you wrote:
OR> In Lazarus it should in theory be possible to make an X Windows program
OR> which can be run in the X Windows enviroment in Mac OS X
Hello,
Right now I'm downloading the latest stable release 1.0.10 of FPC.
Should I download/recompile something additionally to enable
multi-threading support so that memory management and
exception handling works fine with multi-threaded programs I create?
Additional question: does FPC
